期刊文献+

多维多时间-空间尺度水利工程安全风险评价系统及其应用

Multi-dimensional Multi-spatiotemporal Safety Risk Assessment System for Water Conservancy Projects and Its Application
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为解决风险矩阵分析法(LS法)和作业条件危险分析法(LEC法)在水利工程安全风险等级评价过程中评价指标量化依据不明确、判定标准不统一、成果运用可指导性差等缺点,基于风险矩阵原理,建立了多维多时间-空间尺度水利工程安全风险评价系统。研究结果表明:①通过风险评价要素管控措施状态M、暴露于危害的频繁程度或危害出现的频次E和运行周期内工作性态C,及其不同组合,可对水利工程全部类型危险源事故发生可能性L进行细化评价;②风险评价要素M的判定标准与水利工程管理考核标准相统一;③通过风险评价要素C,简要评价实体危险源不同时空工作性态演化与环境改变相互作用;④通过增加上游水位H和运行时段F风险评价要素,并判断危险源与下游防洪是否直接相关,事故造成的伤亡人数和经济损失是否可量化统计,可充分考虑事故后果统计时空分布不均衡的特点,并对水利工程安全风险进行实时动态评估。该研究成果对水利行业安全生产双重预防机制建设具有一定参考价值。 Risk matrix analysis(LS)and operating condition risk analysis(LEC)have some limitations in rating the safety risks of water conservancy project,including unclear quantitative evaluation indicators,inconsistent criteria,and limited guidance for result application.In view of this,we developed a multidimensional and multi-spatiotemporal scale safety risk assessment system based on the risk matrix principle.Our research demonstrated the following outcomes:1)the likelihood(L)of all types of hazard accidents in water conservancy projects can be assessed in detail by considering various combinations of control measures(M),frequency of hazard exposure(E),and working behavior(C)in the operation cycle.2)The assessment criterion of M should be consistent with the standard of water conservancy project management.3)The interaction between physical hazards evolution and environmental change can be assessed through the risk assessment factor C.4)In consideration of the unbalanced spatiotemporal distribution of accident consequences,the safety risks of water conservancy projects can be assessed dynamically by incorporating the upstream water level(H)and operation period(F)and identifying whether hazard sources are directly related to downstream flood control or the casualties and economic losses caused by accidents can be quantified.This dynamic and real-time evaluation approach for water conservancy project safety risks offers a valuable reference for constructing a double prevention mechanism for safe production in the industry.
作者 王翔 郑淇文 李晨 WANG Xiang;ZHENG Qi-wen;LI Chen(Center for River-Lake Protection,Construction and Operation Safety,Changjiang Water ResourcesCommission,Wuhan 430010,China)
出处 《长江科学院院报》 CSCD 北大核心 2023年第12期169-175,共7页 Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute
关键词 水利工程 运行安全 安全生产 多维多时间-空间尺度 安全风险评价系统 water conservancy project safe operation safe production multi-dimensional multi-spatiotemporal safety risk assessment system
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献67

  • 1陈向阳.深层搅拌法在上马水库泄洪闸闸基处理上的应用[J].山西水利科技,2005(2):10-11. 被引量:1
  • 2邓安利.上马水库地裂缝成因及工程处理措施探讨[J].山西水利科技,2007(3):45-46. 被引量:2
  • 3Cox Jr L A. What's wrong with risk matrix[J]. Risk Analysis,2008, 28(2): 497.
  • 4Eskesen S D, Tengborg P, Kampmann J, et al. Guidelines for tunnelling risk management., international tunnelling association, working group No. 2 [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2004, 19: 217.
  • 5Aven T, Heide B. Reliability and validity of risk analysis[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2009, 94.. 1862.
  • 6Cox Jr L A, Babayev D, Huber W. Some limitations of qualitative risk rating systems [J]. Risk Analysis, 2005, 25 (3): 651.
  • 7Ni H H, Chen A, Chen N. Some extensions on risk matrix approach[J]. Safety Science, 2010, 48.. 1269.
  • 8Kaplan S. The words of risk analysis[J]. Risk Analysis, 1997, 17(4) : 407.
  • 9Hansson S O. Seven myths of risk[J]. Risk Management, 2005, 7(2): 7.
  • 10Markowitz H. Portfolio selection[J]. The Journal of Finance, 1952, 7(1).. 77.

共引文献302

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部