期刊文献+

草莓感官评价模型方法比较

Comparison of Sensory Evaluation Models for Strawberry
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为使草莓感官评价结果更客观,不受评价者评价经验、年龄及健康状况等主观因素影响,该研究将草莓的十项理化风味指标如过氧化氢酶、多酚氧化酶等作为输入数据,感官评价得分作为输出数据,运用灰狼优化支持向量机建立草莓感官评价估计模型。为验证所提出模型的优越性,将其与粒子群优化支持向量机模型、卷积神经网络、长短时记忆网络模型进行对比分析,为充分保证所提出模型的有效性,重复实验20次并计算各项指标均值,得到所提出模型的均方根误差和平均绝对误差分别为0.28、0.24(低于粒子群优化支持向量机的误差指标0.46、0.38,长短时记忆网络误差指标1.24、0.99和卷积神经网络误差指标0.88、0.75)。实验结果表明,基于灰狼优化支持向量机模型的预测精度最高、稳定性最好、误差最小,研究结果可为草莓感官评价得分的评定提供参考。 In order to make the result of sensory evaluation of strawberry more objective and independent of subjective factors such as evaluator's evaluation experience,age and health status,in this study,ten physicochemical flavor indicators of strawberry,such as catalase and polyphenol oxidase,were used as the input data,and the sensory evaluation score was used as the output data.The grey wolf optimizer-based support vector machine was used to establish a sensory evaluation prediction model of strawberry.To verify the superiority of the proposed model,this established model was compared with the particle swarm optimization support vector machine model,convolutional neural network model and long-/short-term memory network model.In order to ensure fully the effectiveness of the proposed model,the experiment was repeated 20 times and the mean value of each index was calculated.The root mean square error and the mean absolute error of the proposed model were 0.28 and 0.24,respectively(lower than the error indices for particle swarm optimization support vector machine(0.46 and 0.38),for long short time memory network(1.24 and 0.99),and for convolutional neural network(0.88 and 0.75).The experimental results showed that the grey wolf optimizer-based support vector machine model had the highest prediction accuracy,the highest stability,and the smallest error.The results can provide a reference for the evaluation of strawberry’s sensory evaluation score.
作者 马婉婷 尚伟 谷晏 赵峙尧 孙颖 MA Wanting;SHANG Wei;GU Yan;ZHAO Zhiyao;SUN Ying(School of Chemistry and Materials Engineering,School of Artificial intelligence,Beijing Technology and Business University,Beijing 100048,China;Market Supervision and Administration Bureau of Xicheng District,Beijing 100048,China)
出处 《现代食品科技》 CAS 北大核心 2023年第11期33-40,共8页 Modern Food Science and Technology
基金 国家重点研发计划项目(2022YFF1101103) 北京市教育委员会科技研究计划项目资助(KM202210011006) 北京市自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(6204036) 国家自然科学基金项目(31972191)。
关键词 草莓感官评价 灰狼优化算法 支持向量机 sensory evaluation of strawberry grey wolf optimizer support vector machine
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献90

  • 1陈振宇,刘金波,李晨,季晓慧,李大鹏,黄运豪,狄方春,高兴宇,徐立中.基于LSTM与XGBoost组合模型的超短期电力负荷预测[J].电网技术,2020,44(2):614-620. 被引量:201
  • 2王志坚.酵母发酵副产物与啤酒风味[J].酿酒科技,2001(5):69-70. 被引量:7
  • 3张爱霞,陆淳,生庆海,尹晓霞,邓宏斌.感官分析技术在食品工业中的应用[J].中国乳品工业,2005,33(3):39-40. 被引量:16
  • 4陈玉铭.食品感官分析技术在产品开发中的应用[J].食品研究与开发,2007,28(2):182-185. 被引量:40
  • 5Gustav Styger, Dan Jacobson, Florian F Bauer. Identifying genes that impact on aroma profiles produced by Saccharo- myces cerevisiae and the production of higher alcohols[ J ]. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 2011 (91) : 713 - 710.
  • 6Krista M Sumby, Paul R Grbin, Vladimir Jiranek. Micro- bial modulation of aromatic esters in wine: Current knowl- edge and future prospects[J]. Food Chemistry, 2010,121 (I): 1-16.
  • 7Alisa Rudnitskaya, Evgeny Polshin, Dmitry Kirsanov, et al. Instrumental measurement of beer taste attributes using an electronic tongue J]. Analytica Chimica Acta, 2009, 646(1): 111-118.
  • 8Mahdi Ghasemi-Varnamkhasti, Seyed Saeid Mohtasebi, Maria Luz Rodriguez-Mendez,et al. Classification of non- alcoholic beer based on aftertaste sensory evaluation by ehemometric tools [ J ]. Expert Systems with Applica- tions, 2012,39(4) : 4 315 -4 327.
  • 9Tian Jiyuan. Determination of several flavours in beer with headspace sampling-gas chromatography [ J ]. Food Chemistry, 2010,123(4): 1 318- 1 321.
  • 10刘春凤,郑飞云,李永仙,李崎,董建军,顾国贤.啤酒口感品评的模糊综合评价法[J].食品科学,2008,29(4):138-142. 被引量:32

共引文献180

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部