斯蒂格勒,博伊斯和社会雕塑

Bernard Stiegler, Joseph Beuys and Social Sculpture

斯蒂格勒认为参与是心智灵魂现实化的条件,但这种参与已经依赖于技术,这同时导致了“参与的丧失”和“象征的贫困”。尤其是在超工业社会中,营销技术控制了人们的意识时间,导致消费者普遍的“废人化”。斯蒂格勒在博伊斯的“社会雕塑”概念中看到了为抵抗“参与的丧失”所作的贡献,并试图通过复活“业余爱好者”的概念延续博伊斯的“社会雕塑”的思路。“业余爱好者”以自由发明的方式不断地从潜能走向实现,并在这个过程中形成了独异性。这是一种新的艺术形式,也重新发明了政治,即独异性的政治,业余爱好者通过自己赋予自己时间而塑造共同体的时间,完成“社会雕塑”的任务。

Bernard Stiegler believes that participation is a condition for the acting out of noetic soul,but participation's dependence on technology simultaneously leads to the“loss of participation”and“symbolic misery”.In the hyper-industrial society,in particular,marketing technology controls people's time of consciousness and leads to the prevailing“proletarianization”among consumers.Stiegler sees in Beuys'social sculpture use to resist the“loss of participation”,attempting to continue this idea by reviving the concept of amateurs.In the form of free invention,amateurs realize potential and form singularity in the process.This is a new art form,which also reinvents politics,namely the politics of singularity.Through obtaining their own time,amateurs shape the time of community and complete the task of social sculpture.