期刊文献+

麦金太尔“传统”观念探究——基于“追寻美德筹划”的分析

Research on Mac Intyre's Concept of Tradition:Analysis Based on“After Virtue Project”
原文传递
导出
摘要 “传统”是麦金太尔“追寻美德筹划”中的核心观念。在《追寻美德》中,麦金太尔初步说明了何谓传统,它如何为理解美德提供背景。在《谁之正义?何种合理性?》中,麦金太尔论述了一种基于传统的认识论,引入了探究传统的观念,强调在进行道德探究的时候离不开其背后的传统;在《三种互竞的道德探究观》中,麦金太尔论述了托马斯主义的探究观,认为这一探究观是基于传统的道德探究观。麦金太尔的“传统”观念引起很多学者的异议,他们批评麦金太尔加剧了道德相对主义、用权威和信仰替换了理性、这一理论并无现实性等等。仔细思考麦金太尔传统观念的语境,这些批评都能得到相应的回应。麦金太尔对于“传统”的强调为伦理学探究提供了新的视野。
作者 张言亮 唐虎 Zhang Yanliang;Tang Hu
出处 《世界哲学》 北大核心 2023年第6期138-146,共9页 World Philosophy
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献34

  • 1Alasdair MacIntyre, Whose Justice? Which Rationality?, Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 1988, pp. 10-11.
  • 2Kelvin Knight, "Introduction", in The Maclntyre Reader, edited by Kelvin Knight, Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 1998, p. 27.
  • 3Alasdair MacIntyre, After Virtue, Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, Second Edition, 1984, p. 222.
  • 4Alasdair MacIntyre, Whose Justice? Which Rationality?, Notre Dame, indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 1988, p. 335, p. 349.
  • 5Alasdair Maclntyre, Whose Justice? Which Rationality?, Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 1988, p. 345.
  • 6Alasdair Maclntyre, Whose Justice9 Which Rationality?, Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 19881 p. 8.
  • 7Alasdair Maclntyre, Whose Justice? Which Rationality?, Notre Dame, Indiana : University of Notre Dame Press, 1988, p. 9.
  • 8Alasdair Maclntyre, Whose Justice? Which Rationalitr?, Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 1988, p. 327.
  • 9Alasdair Maclntyre, Whose Justice? Which Rationality?, Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 1988, pp. 354 ~ 363.
  • 10Alasdair Maclntyre, Whose Justice? Which Rationality?, Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 1988, pp. 363-365.

共引文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部