期刊文献+

基于时空指标的人车冲突等级评价及影响分析 被引量:1

Evaluation of pedestrian-vehicle conflict severity at non-signalized crosswalks by combining time and distance gap data
下载PDF
导出
摘要 无信号控制路段人车冲突评估对于实施交通安全策略具有重要意义。采用交通调查和数据分析的方法,通过Tracker软件处理试验视频获取人、车、路3方面数据和15个解释变量信息,并将考虑时空的复合T DI(Time Distance Evaluation Indicator)作为人车冲突评价指标。随后,利用一维K means聚类算法确定边界值,以对人车冲突等级进行划分。建立基于Odered Probit回归分析的人车冲突量化模型,利用Stata软件标定模型参数。结果显示,基于时空指标的人车冲突中,行人“结伴行为”“使用电子设备”“一阶段过街”对冲突等级影响显著,且呈正相关。其中,女性比男性冲突更严重。“过街等待时长”“行人过街速度”与冲突等级呈负相关,“大客(货)车”对冲突等级影响显著(0.4072),且均在95%的置信区间中显著。 The evaluation of pedestrian-vehicle conflict at nonsignal control sections is of great significance for the adoption of traffic safety strategies.This paper used the methods of traffic video recording and field research to obtain experimental data and conduct analysis.The recording traffic video was processed by Tacker software to obtain the data of pedestrians,vehicles and roads,and the information of 15 explanatory variables.The composite T DI(Time-Distance evaluation Indicator)value considering time and distance was used as the evaluation index of the conflict between pedestrians and vehicles.The weight coefficient of the time index and distance index were determined by the AHP method(Analytic Hierarchy Process).Then,the threshold value of T DI value was determined by a onedimensional K means clustering algorithm,the threshold value corresponding to the critical value of different conflict levels and the level of pedestrian-vehicle conflict is divided.Then a quantitative model of pedestrian-vehicle conflict based on the Ordered Probit(OP)regression model was established.On this basis,the impact of pedestrian crossing micro behavior on the severity of pedestrian-vehicle conflict at non-signal controlled sections was further discussed.The model parameters were calibrated using Stata software.A total of 8 indicators have a significant impact on the level of pedestrian-vehicle conflict in the non-signal control section.The results showed that the pedestrian-related variables“partnering behavior”,“using electronic devices”,and“one-stage street crossing”had a significant and positive correlation with the conflict level in the pedestrian-vehicle conflict based on T DI indicators.Women had more serious conflicts than men,and the variables“waiting time”and“pedestrian crossing speed”had a negative correlation with the conflict level,the variable“Large passenger(freight)vehicles”have a significant impact on the level of conflict and the value is prominent(0.4072).The above results were all in the 95%confidence interval.
作者 蒋沛 马新露 刘松 赵毅文 JIANG Pei;MA Xinlu;LIU Song;ZHAO Yiwen(School of Transportation,Chongqing Jiaotong University,Chongqing 400000,China)
出处 《安全与环境学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2023年第11期4042-4048,共7页 Journal of Safety and Environment
基金 国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(61803057) 重庆市博士“直通车”科研项目(CSTB2022BSXM JCX0099) 重庆交通大学科学基金项目(20JDKJC B051)。
关键词 安全工程 人车冲突 OP模型 行人过街 safety engineering pedestrian-vehicle conflict Ordered Probit(OP)model pedestrian crossing
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献20

  • 1公安部交通管理局.中华人民共和国道路交通事故统计年报:2012年[R].北京:公安部交通管理局,2013.
  • 2Zhou Zhuping, Liu Yingshun, Wang Wei, et al. Multi- nomial logit model of pedestrian crossing behaviors at signalized intersections [ J ]. Discrete Dynamics in Na- ture and Society, 2013, 2013 : 172726-1 - 172726-8.
  • 3Lord D. Analysis of pedestrian conflicts with left-turn- ing traffic [ J]. Transportation Research Record, 1996, 1538 : 61 - 67.
  • 4Alhajyaseen W K M, Asano M, Nakamura H. Estima- tion of left-turning vehicle maneuvers for the assessment of pedestrian safety at intersections [ J ]. IATSS Re- search, 2012, 36(1): 66-74.
  • 5Wang X, Abdel-Aty M. Analysis of left-turn crash inju- ry severity by conflicting pattern using partial propor-tional odds models [ J ]. Accident Analysis and Preven- tion, 2008, 40(5) : 1674 - 1682.
  • 6Ismail K, Sayed T, Saunier N, et al. Automated analy- sis of pedestrian-vehicle conflicts using video data [ J ]. Transportation Research Record, 2009, 2140:44 -54.
  • 7Alhajyaseen W K M, Asano M, Nakamura H, et al. Gap acceptance models for left-turning vehicles facing pedestrians at signalized crosswalks[ C/OL]//3rd Inter- national Conference on Road Safety and Simulation. In- dianapolis, USA, 2011. http ://onlinepubs. trb. org/on- linepubs/conferences/2011/RSS/3/Alhajyaseen, W. pdf.
  • 8李杰,陈学武,王炜.交通冲突严重度模糊评价方法[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2008,8(2):91-95. 被引量:5
  • 9陆斯文,方守恩,王俊骅.单车道行人激进过街冲突和碰撞事故机理分析[J].重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版),2009,28(1):108-110. 被引量:6
  • 10王俊骅,方守恩.行人机动车冲突模型及其行人过街风险控制应用[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2009,37(9):1191-1195. 被引量:14

共引文献23

同被引文献8

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部