期刊文献+

民生权概念的再审视 被引量:3

Rethinking the Concept of the Right to People's Livelihood
下载PDF
导出
摘要 民生权利的界定及研究,在国内已有不少成果,但仍需作进一步的辨析与界定。民生权不能简单地等同于社会权,仅为积极权利,其还具有消极权利的属性;民生权利并非是只能由国家和社会辅佐下才能实现的权利,权利的主体既包括全体社会成员,也包括特定场景下的弱者;个人对自己的民生幸福同样承担重要的责任。对民生权的界定,须遵循法学方法论上有关概念的给定准则,并注意其与其他权利形态的差异。总体而言,民生权是人们在保全自我、经营生计基础上实现幸福生活的权利,“民生”“自然权利”“幸福生活”是理解这一概念的主要切入点。 The research about the right to people's livelihood has reached many achievements but still needs further analysis and clarification.The right to people's livelihood cannot simply be equated with social rights,it is a positive right but also a negative right.Its realization not only relies on the help of the state and society,but individuals also bear important responsibilities for their own livelihood and happiness.Moreover,the objects of exercising the right to people's livelihood are all members of society,including the weak in specific situations.The definition of the right to people's livelihood rights should follow the concept-definitionrules of legal methodology and consider differences with other rights.Generally speaking,the right to people's livelihood is the right to reach a happy life based on self-preservation and manage their lives,and notions like"people's livelihood","natural rights"and"happy life"are core to understand the right to people's livelihood.
作者 胡玉鸿 Hu Yuhong(Institute of Human Rights,East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042)
出处 《浙江社会科学》 北大核心 2023年第12期43-55,157,共14页 Zhejiang Social Sciences
基金 澳门大学“杰出访问学者”研究计划 南京师范大学中国法治现代化研究院资助 国家社会科学基金重大项目(21&ZD190)“习近平法治思想中的民生保障理论研究” 国家社科基金重点项目(20AZD028)“健全社会公平正义法治保障制度研究”的阶段性成果。
关键词 民生 民生权 社会权 自然权利 幸福生活 people's livelihood right to people's livelihood social right natural rights happy life
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献40

  • 1葛洪义.论法律权利的概念[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),1989,11(1):18-22. 被引量:19
  • 2Audi, Robert, 1997, "Moral judgment and reasons for action", in Garrett Cullity and Berys Gaut ( eds. ), Ethics and Practical Reason, Oxford : Clarendon Press.
  • 3Bix, Brian H. , 2006, "Legal positivism", in Martin P. Golding and William A. Edmundson ( ed. ), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory, Malden, Oxford & Victoria: Blackwell Publishing.
  • 4Raz, Joseph, 1979, The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality, Oxford University Press.
  • 5Raz, Joseph, 1986, The Morality of Freedom, Oxford .. Clarendon Press.
  • 6Shapiro, Scott J. , 2002, "Authority", in Jules L. Coleman and Scott Shapiro (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law, Oxford University Press.
  • 7Williams, Bernard, 1981, "Internal and external reasons", in Bernard Williams, Moral Luck, Cambridge University Press.
  • 8David Estlund, Democratic Authority : A Philosophical Framework, Princeton and Oxford :Princeton University Press, 2008.
  • 9Noam Gur, "Legal directives in the realm of practical reason: a challenge to the preemption thesis", in The American Journal ofJurisprndence, Vol. 52, 2007.
  • 10Scott Hershovitz, "Legitimacy, democracy, and Razian authority", in Legal Theory, Vol. 9, 2003.

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部