摘要
自《民法典》出台以来,围绕第1232条有关环境领域的惩罚性赔偿适用的问题,学界一直存有不少争议。特别对于惩罚性赔偿能否运用于环境公益诉讼这一问题的争论尤为激烈。尽管在审判实践中已有不少法院选择支持适用惩罚性赔偿的诉请,且最高法也出台了相关的司法解释,但此举是否与立法的本意契合仍需推敲。本文着眼于环境公益领域惩罚性赔偿制度的适用困境与现实需求,在探寻环境公益领域适用惩罚性赔偿的正当性的同时,重新审视其构成要件,以求二者之间能达成适配。
Since the introduction of the Civil Code,there has been a lot of controversy about the application of punitive damages in the field of environment in Article 1232.In particular,the debate on whether punitive damages can be applied to environmental public interest litigation is particularly fierce.Although there have been many cases of punitive damages applied on this basis in judicial practice,and a supporting judicial interpretation has been introduced,it is not consistent with the original intention of legislation.This paper focuses on the application dilemma and practical needs of the punitive damages system in the field of environmental public welfare.While exploring the legitimacy of the application of punitive damages in the field of environmental public welfare,it re-examines its constituent elements to ensure that the two can be adapted.
出处
《北京政法职业学院学报》
2023年第4期79-85,共7页
Journal of Beijing College of Politics and Law
基金
2022年度贵州民族大学校级课题“生态环境损害惩罚性赔偿研究——基于《民法典》第1232条与案例的分析展开”的阶段性研究成果,项目编号:2022SZC003。
关键词
环境民事公益诉讼
惩罚性赔偿
公私分立
要件构成
environmental civil public interest litigation
punitive damages
separation of public and private
element composition