期刊文献+

现代生物医学技术的“祛弱”合理性探析——以代孕为例

Rationality Analysis of"Dispelling Vulnerability"in Modern Biomedical Technology:Take Surrogacy as An Example
下载PDF
导出
摘要 围绕现代生物医学技术所产生的“自主性”和“脆弱性”的伦理争议提示我们,其中存在着有待解决的“祛弱”问题。祛弱权在平等关照他人脆弱性的前提下,尊重个体的合理祛弱需求,以“个体祛弱”和“社会祛弱”为目的对技术的价值合理性提出道德要求。以代孕为例,在个体祛弱层面,医学目的的妊娠型代孕能够得到一定程度的道德和伦理支持。在社会祛弱层面,不管是商业性代孕还是利他性代孕,都缺乏必要且充分的现实条件,禁止商业性代孕、谨慎对待(医学目的的妊娠型)利他性代孕以维护弱者的尊严,这是代孕的价值合理性的根本体现。 Ethical debates surrounding the concepts of"autonomy"and"vulnerability"generated by modern biomedical technologies prompt us to address the unresolved issue of"dispelling vulnerability".The right of dispelling vulnerability respects individual's reasonable demand for dispelling vulnerability on the premise of equal consideration for the vulnerability of others,and puts forward moral requirements on the value rationality of technology with the purpose of"dispelling individual vulnerability"and"dispelling vulnerability in society".Taking surrogacy as an example,on the individual vulnerability level,medically-oriented gestational surrogacy can receive a certain degree of moral and ethical support.On the social vulnerability mitigation level,whether it is commercial surrogacy or altruistic surrogacy,lacks necessary and sufficient realistic conditions.Prohibiting commercial surrogacy and approaching altruistic surrogacy(aimed at gestational and medical purposes)with caution are essential measures to uphold the dignity of vulnerable individuals.This underscores the fundamental manifestation of the ethical value of surrogacy.
作者 文成伟 张晨虹 WEN Cheng-wei;ZHANG Chen-hong(School of Marxism,Northeast University,Shenyang 110819,China)
出处 《医学与哲学》 北大核心 2023年第13期10-14,共5页 Medicine and Philosophy
基金 2019年国家社会科学基金重点项目(19AZX006)。
关键词 现代生物医学技术 脆弱性 自主性 祛弱权 代孕 modern biomedical technology vulnerability autonomy right of dispelling vulnerability surrogacy
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献68

  • 1See United Nations Dev. Programme, Human Development Report 2009, at 195 tbl. m (2009).
  • 2Fredman, Positive Duties and Socio-Economic Disadvantage: Bringing Disadvantage onto the Equality Agenda, 2010 Eur. Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 290, 295 (Eng.) (quoting Equality Act 2010, c. 15, 149(1) ).
  • 3See, e.g. , Lyng v. Int'l Union, 485 U.S. 360, 371 (1988).
  • 4Fair Housing Act of 1968, Pub. L. No. 90 -284, 82 Stat.
  • 5citing Canadian Human Rights Act Review Panel, Pronmting Equality: A New Vision 106 - 13(2000) , available at dsp - psd. pwgsc, gc. ca/Collection/J2 - 168 - 2000E. pdf.
  • 6See Jonathan Fineman, The Inevitable Demise of the Implied Employment Contract, 29 Berkeley J. Emp. & Lab. L. 345 (2008).
  • 7See, e. g. , Engquist v. Or. Dep' t of Agric. , 128 S. Ct. 2146, 2149 (2008).
  • 8See, e. g. , Does Affirmative Action Punish Whites?Courts See a Growing Number of Reverse Discrimination Cases, MSNBC. COM, Apr. 28, 2009, http://www, msnbc, msn. com/id/ 30462129/.
  • 9See, e.g. , See Also Roy L. Brooks & Kristen Widner, In Defense of the BlackWhite Binary: Reclaiming a Tradition of Civil Rights Scholarship, 12 Berkeley J. Afr. Am. L. & Pol'y 107.
  • 10See Witt v. Dep' t of the Air Force, 527 F. 3d 806,823 (9th Cir. 2008).

共引文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部