摘要
中法战争前,法国殖民者向中越宗藩关系的合法性发出了挑战。为了便于交涉,晚清政府尝试运用国际法来论证中越宗藩关系的合法性,这反而使清廷陷入有理难辩的话语困境。文章结合权力话语理论,从话语霸权和主体认同两个方面来分析晚清政府的国际话语权困境及其原因。
Before the Sino-French War,the French colonists challenged the legitimacy of the suzerain-vassal relationship between china and vietnam.In order to facilitate negotiations,the late Qing government tried to use international law to demonstrate the legitimacy of the suzerain-vassal relationship between china and vietnam,which in turn put the Qing government into a difficult-to-argue discourse dilemma.This article combines power discourse theory to analyze the late Qing government’s international discourse power dilemma and its reasons from two aspects:discourse hegemony and subject identity.
作者
李庆丰
方周
LI Qingfeng;FANG Zhou(Zhengzhou University of Aeronautics,Zhengzhou 450046,China;School of History,Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou 450001,China)
出处
《郑州航空工业管理学院学报(社会科学版)》
2023年第6期66-71,共6页
Journal of Zhengzhou University of Aeronautics(Social Science Edition)
基金
2021年度国家社科青年项目(21CSS021)。
关键词
权力话语理论
国际话语权
中越宗藩关系
power discourse theory
international discourse power
suzerain-vassal relationship between china and vietnam