基于新冠相关文献的中外全科医学领域科研现状对比分析

Comparative analysis of research status on general practice between China and overseas based on the Coronavirus disease 2019 literature

目的通过分析国内外已发表的新型冠状病毒感染(简称新冠)全科医学领域相关文献,了解目前我国全科医学领域科研现状以及与国际间的差距,从而弥补不足,为我国全科医学科研发展提供参考。方法以知网和万方为中文文献来源,以“Web of Science”为英文文献来源,通过主题检索方式检索国内外新冠全科医学领域发表的相关文献,检索时间为2020年1月1日—2022年12月31日。运用文献计量学和内容分析法对纳入的文献类型、发文机构和研究热点分别进行分析。结果共纳入127篇中文文献,222篇英文文献,国内该领域的研究机构主要集中在北京、武汉以及成都经济较发达的地区,缺乏机构间的合作。研究类型国内主要以横断面研究为主,定性研究为辅,国际主要以横断面研究为主,定性研究和队列研究为辅。国内研究主要集中在心理、教育以及人工智能方面,少数研究涉及居家防护、疫苗接种以及与医联体(医共体)相关的研究;国际研究主题主要集中在心理、远程医疗以及职业规划和教育方面,同时涉及部分新冠疫苗和“长新冠”的相关研究。结论通过新冠全科医学领域文献计量学分析可知我国全科医学领域相关研究还处于发展阶段,机构间合作较松散;同时使用的科研方法较单一;研究热点与国际研究存在一定的差异,既有共性又有自身特征。

Objective The purpose of this study was to understand the status of research in the field of general practice and the gaps with international research by analyzing the relevant published papers and providing a reference for future research.Methods The papers of general practice on Coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19)were searched by subject retrieval method.The Chinese retrieval database included CNKI and Wanfang database,and the English retrieval database included Web of Science.The retrieval time was from January 1,2020 to December 31,2022.The bibliometric analysis and content analysis were used to analyze the type,institution,and hotspots respectively.Results A total of 127 Chinese and 222 English papers were included,and the institutions were mainly located in Beijing,Wuhan,and Chengdu,lacing the cooperative relationship among institutions.The research of general practice on COVID-19 was mainly based on cross-sectional study,supplemented by qualitative research in China;and the international researches were mainly focused on cross-sectional studies,supplemented by qualitative and cohort studies.Domestic research topics mainly focus on psychology,education,and artificial intelligence,and a few studies involve home protection,vaccination,and medical consortiums.International research topics mainly focus on psychology,telemedicine,career planning,and education,and also involve some vaccines and"long COVID-19".Conclusion The research of general practice is still in the primary stage of development,and the cooperation between institutions was relatively insufficient.The research methods used are relatively simple,and there are certain differences in research hotspots between China and the international,with both commonalities and unique characteristics.