期刊文献+

不同加载制度下型钢混凝土框架抗震性能对比

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF STEEL REINFORCED CONCRETE FRAME WITHDIFFERENTLOADINGPROCESS
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为研究不同加载制度对型钢混凝土框架抗震性能的影响规律,文中采用屈服位移加载制度、位移角加载制度和最大变形幅值百分比加载制度对型钢混凝土框架模型进行了模拟低周反复加载试验。对比分析了三种加载制度下模型骨架曲线、刚度退化、能量耗散系数以及等效粘滞阻尼系数的变化规律。分析结果表明,三种不同加载制度下所得到的型钢混凝土框架各项抗震指标接近,峰值荷载误差为2%以内,刚度退化方面走势基本相同,初始刚度、残余刚度与试验值相对误差在30%以内,而耗能变化规律基本一致,均高于试验值。基于文中分析结果,位移角加载制度更优。 In order to study the influence of different loading systems on the seismic performance of steel reinforced concrete frames,a simulated low cycle repeated loading test is conducted on the steel reinforced concrete frame mod-el using yield displacement loading system,displacement angle loading system,and maximum deformation ampli-tude percentage loading system.Comparative analysis is conducted on the changes in the skeleton curve,stiffness degradation,energy dissipation coefficient,and equivalent viscous damping coefficient of the model under three dif-ferent loading systems.The results show that the seismic indicators of the steel reinforced concrete frame obtained under three different loading systems are similar,with a peak load error of less than 2%.The trend of stiffness degra-dation is basically the same,and the relative errors of initial stiffness and residual stiffness with experimental values are within 30%.
作者 杨涛 解恒燕 田丰 郑鑫 YANG Tao;XIE Hengyan;TIAN Feng;ZHENG Xin(College of civil Engineering and Water Conservancy,Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University,Heilongjiang Daqing 163319,China)
出处 《低温建筑技术》 2023年第11期56-60,共5页 Low Temperature Architecture Technology
基金 黑龙江省自然科学基金联合引导项目(LH2019E072)
关键词 不同加载制度 型钢混凝土框架 模拟低周反复加载 diffident loading process steel reinforced concrete frame simulated low cyclic loading
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献54

  • 1王东升,冯启民,王国新.考虑低周疲劳寿命的改进Park-Ang地震损伤模型[J].土木工程学报,2004,32(11):41-49. 被引量:99
  • 2杨晓明,丰定国,杨睿.不同加载制度下钢筋混凝土柱抗震性能的试验研究[J].工业建筑,2005,35(9):42-45. 被引量:15
  • 3顾祥林,黄庆华,吴周偲.钢筋混凝土柱考虑损伤累积的反复荷载-位移关系分析[J].地震工程与工程振动,2006,26(4):68-74. 被引量:24
  • 4朱伯龙.结构抗震实验[M].北京:地震出版社,1989.
  • 5JGJ101-96.建筑抗震试验方法规程[S].[S].,..
  • 6Park R. Simulated seismic load tests on reinforced concrete ele- ments and structures [ C ]//Earthquake engineering, 10th world conference, 1994, Balkema, Rotterdam.
  • 7Robert T, Leon and Gregory G. Deierlein. Considerations for the Use of Quasi-Static Testing [ J ]. Earthquake Spectra, 1996, 12 ( 1 ) :87-109.
  • 8Santiago Pujol, Mete A, Sozen, et al. Ramirez. Displacement History Effects on Drift Capacity of Reinforced Concrete Columns[ J]. ACI Structural Journal ,2006,103 ( 2 ) :253-262.
  • 9Kip Gatto, Chia-Ming Uang. Effects of Loading Protocol on the Cy- clic Response of Woodframe Shearwalls [ J ]. Journal of Structural engineering,2003,129 : 1384 -1393.
  • 10Helmut Krawinkler. Loading histories for cyclic tests in support of performance assessment of structural components [ C ]//3 rd Inter- national Conference on Advances in Experimental Structural Engi- neering : San Francisco, Octoberl5-16,2009.

共引文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部