论执行分配方案异议之诉裁判方式的选择

On the Choice of Judgment Methods for Objections to the Implementation of Distribution Plans

由于法律规范供给不足,关于执行分配方案异议之诉的裁判方式,实践中存在六种判法、两种类型。从顺应审执分离改革潮流、遵循诉讼标的理论、回归诉之类型本质、符合执行效率原则以及类推适用上诉审裁判方式出发,执行分配方案异议之诉应采取第二种类型的裁判方式———在判决主文就财产分配方案的相关实体性争议进行判决。在第二种类型裁判方式下应该选择具体哪种裁判方式,未来强制执行法立法的理想状态应该是实践中的判法六,即在判决主文就债权人具体的受偿比例、应受偿数额等进行判决。

Due to the insufficient supply of legal norms,there are six methods of judgments and two types of judgments in practice regarding objections to the implementation of distribution plans.Starting from following the trend of reform in the separation of trial and execution,following the theory of litigation subject matter,returning to the essence of the type of litigation,complying with the principle of execution efficiency,and applying the appellate trial judgment method by analogy,the second type of judgment method should be adopted for the objection to the execution of the distribution plan-to make judgments on substantive disputes related to the property distribution plan in the main text of the judgment.Under the second type of judgment method,for which specific judgment method to be chosen,and for future legislation on compulsory enforcement law,the ideal choice should be Judgment Method 6 in practice,which is to make judgments on the specific proportion and amount of compensation that creditors should receive in the main text of the judgment.