司法政策进入司法裁判的路径探析

Exploration of the Paths of Judicial Policy into Judicial Decisions

司法政策是现代法治国家的重要规范,司法政策进入司法裁判是我国法治现代化建设的一项重要内容,对于全面依法治国具有重要作用。在既有实践中,司法政策进入司法裁判有三条主要路径,分别为“当事人陈述”“裁判理由”和“裁判依据”。除主要路径,司法政策进入司法裁判的途径还有“首部程序性适用”“尾部陈列性适用”和“裁判引用性适用”三条辅助路径。但从实践看,既有路径存在“当事人陈述”路径急需规范、“裁判理由”路径有待完善、“裁判依据”路径值得商榷等问题。基于此,应当从强调多方责任、统一政策适用、慎重对待“裁判依据”路径等方面优化既有路径,以实现司法政策进入司法裁判的规范化,进一步推动司法公正的实现。

Judicial policy is an important norm of a modern state governed by the rule of law,and the entry of judicial policy into judicial adjudication is an important element in the modernization of the rule of law in China,and plays an important role in the overall rule of law.In established practice,there are three main paths for judicial policy into judicial adjudication,namely,“statement of the parties”,“reasons for adjudication”and“basis for adjudication”.In addition to the main path,there are three auxiliary paths for the judicial policy into the judicial decision,they are“the first part of the procedural application”,“the last part of the display of the application”and“referee citation of the application”.However,from the practical point of view,the existing path of the“statement of the parties”is in urgent need of standardization,the path of“decision reason”to be improved,the path of“decision basis”is questionable.Based on the issues above,the existing path should be optimized in terms of emphasizing the responsibility of multiple parties,unifying the application of policies,and treating the path of“the basis for decision”with caution,in order to realize the standardization of judicial policies into judicial decisions,and thus promote the realization of judicial justice.