期刊文献+

数字经济趋势下新就业形态发展及其社会保护 被引量:1

The Development of New Employment Forms and Their Social Protection under the Trend of Digital Economy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 数字经济的发展正在改变着传统的就业模式,数字技术支撑的平台经济催生出一大批新就业形态,表现出灵活多样的从业形式和就业特征。这些新型就业形态的用工类型较以往的标准化用工发生了很大的变化,平台、代理商、从业者等多方主体的存在使劳动关系界定复杂化,传统劳动关系的认定标准已无法完全适用于平台的新型用工关系。积极面对技术发展引致的社会结构调整,加强对新就业形态劳动者的社会保护,是经济社会协调发展的内在需求。 The development of digital economy is changing the traditional employment model,and the platform economy supported by digital technology has spawned a large number of new employment forms,showing flexible and diverse employment forms and employment characteristics.The employment types of these new forms of employment have undergone earth-shaking changes compared with the previous standardized employment,and the existence of platforms,agents,practitioners and other parties has complicated the definition of labor relations,and the identification standards of traditional labor relations can no longer be applied to the new employment relations of platforms.Actively facing the adjustment of social structure caused by technological development and strengthening the social protection of workers in new employment forms is an inherent demand for coordinated economic and social development.
作者 赵魁斌 ZHAO Kuibin(School of Marxisim,University of Shanghai for Science and Technology,Shanghai 200093,China)
出处 《青岛职业技术学院学报》 2023年第5期55-60,共6页 Journal of Qingdao Technical College
基金 国家社科基金一般项目(22BKS181)。
关键词 数字经济 新就业形态 劳动关系 社会保护 digital economy new forms of employment labor relations social protection
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献60

  • 1陆维特,陈婷婷,闫鹏飞.城市共享单车利益相关者判定与分类方法研究[J].中国水运(下半月),2020(10):45-46. 被引量:1
  • 2吕琳.论“劳动者”主体界定之标准[J].法商研究,2005,22(3):30-36. 被引量:57
  • 3郑尚元.雇佣关系调整的法律分界——民法与劳动法调整雇佣类合同关系的制度与理念[J].中国法学,2005(3):80-89. 被引量:76
  • 4[德]雷蒙德·瓦尔特曼.《德国劳动法》,沈建峰,译,法律出版社,2014年版,第46页.
  • 5See Daniel Rauch and David Schleicher, Like Uber, But for Local Government Policy: The Future of Local Regulation of the "Shared Economy", http://marroninstitute.nyu.edu/uploads/content/The_Future of Local_Regulation of the Shared_Economy.pdf, last visit on March 21,2015.
  • 6See Douglas O'Connor, et al., v. Uber Technologies, Inc., et al., Case No. 13-cv-03826-EMC., Docket No. 251 (2015).
  • 7See Douglas O'Connor, et al., v. Uber Technologies, Inc., et al., Case No. 13-cv-03826-EMC., Docket No. 357 (2015).
  • 8See Dan Levine, Uber Drivers' Labor Lawsuit Granted Class Action Status in California, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/ uber-drivers-labor-lawsuit-granted-class-action-status-in-california us 55e60a54e4b0b7a9633aa657, last visit on March 18, 2015.
  • 9See Naravan v. EGL, Inc., 616 F. 3d 901 (9th Cir. 2010).
  • 10See Yellow Cab Coop. Inc. v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd., 226 Cal. App. 3d 1288 (1991).

同被引文献4

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部