期刊文献+

基于深度学习图像重建算法的低管电压腹部CT平扫图像质量价值评估 被引量:1

Image Quality Assessment of Low Tube Voltage Abdominal Plain CT with Deep Learning Image Reconstruction Algorithm
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨深度学习图像重建(DLIR)算法、多模型迭代重建(ASiR-V)算法和滤波反投影(FBP)算法在低管电压条件下对腹部平扫CT图像质量的影响。方法前瞻性搜集因病情需要行全腹部CT平扫检查的56例患者,根据体质量指数(BMI)将入选患者分为A组(18 kg/m^(2)≤BMI<24 kg/m^(2),管电压80 kVp,n=29)、B组(24 kg/m^(2)≤BMI<29 kg/m^(2),管电压100 kVp,n=27)。所有图像数据均进行FBP、权重为50%的ASiR-V(ASiR-V50%)和高强度DLIR(DLIR-H)图像重建。采用Kruskal-Wallis H检验比较不同重建算法图像间的各项客观评价指标[噪声、肝脏和胰腺的信号噪声比(SNR)、肝脏和胰腺的对比噪声比(CNR)]和主观评价指标(噪声、总体图像质量),组内两两比较采用Bonferroni校正检验。结果A组和B组的DLIR-H图像的噪声,肝脏、胰腺SNR均显著优于FBP和ASiR-V50%,差异均有统计学意义(P值均<0.05)。在80 kVp组和100 kVp组,DLIR-H的噪声较FBP降低66.8%和68.7%,较ASiR-V50%降低46.1%和48.7%。DLIR-H肝脏和胰腺的CNR高于FBP,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),DLIR-H和ASiR-V50%、ASiR-V50%和FBP间肝脏和胰腺的CNR差异无统计学意义(P值均>0.05)。主观评分上,A组和B组DLIR-H的主观噪声和总体图像质量高达4分以上,均高于FBP和ASiR-V50%(P值均<0.05)。结论与ASiR-V50%和FBP相比,DLIR-H降低了图像噪声,提高了图像质量,在辐射剂量优化方面有更大的潜力。 Objective To investigate the effects of deep learning image reconstruction(DLIR)algorithm,adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V(ASiR-V)algorithm and filtered back projection(FBP)on abdominal plain CT image quality under low tube voltage.Methods Fifty-six patients who underwent abdominal CT plain scans were collected prospectively and divided into group A(18 kg/m^(2)≤BMI<24 kg/m^(2),80 kVp,n=29)and Group B(24 kg/m^(2)≤BMI<29 kg/m^(2),100kVp,n=27)according to their BMI.All images were reconstructed with FBP,ASiR-V50%and DLIR at highstrength level(DLIR-H).Quantitative parameters[image noise,liver and pancreas signal to noise ratio(SNR),liver and pancreas contrast to noise ratio(CNR)] and qualitative parameters(image noise and overall image quality)were compared by Kruskal-Wallis H test,and the Bonferroni test was used for multiple comparisons within the group.Results The noise,liver,and pancreas SNR of DLIR-H images were significantly better than those of FBP and ASiR-V50%in both group A and group B.The differences were statistically significant(all P<0.05).In the 80 kVp and 100 kVp groups,the noise of DLIR was reduced by 66.8%and 68.7%compared with FBP,and by 46.1%and 48.7%compared with ASiR-V50%.The CNR of liver and pancreas of DLIR-H was higher than that of FBP,and the dfferences were statistically significant(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in CNR of liver and pancreas between DLIR-H and ASiR-V50%,ASiR-V50%and FBP(both P>0.05).On subjective scores,DLIR-H in groups A and B had subjective noise and overall image quality up to 4 points,both higher than FBP and ASiR-V50%.Conclusion Compared with ASiR-V50%and FBP,DLIRH reduced noise and improved overall image quality which may promote a further radiation dose reduction in the future.
作者 刘娜娜 吕培杰 王会霞 刘星 詹鹏超 陈岩 李臻 高剑波 LIU Nana;LYU Peijie;WANG Huixia(Department of Radiology,the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou,Henan Province 450052,P.R.China)
出处 《临床放射学杂志》 北大核心 2023年第11期1820-1825,共6页 Journal of Clinical Radiology
基金 河南省高等学校重点科研项目(编号:22A320057)。
关键词 深度学习图像重建 低管电压 迭代重建算法 辐射剂量 图像质量 eep learning image reconstruction Low tube voltage Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V Radiation dose Imagequality
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献48

  • 1苑静波,刘冲,贾丽英,赵青,叩新军,徐丽梅.多层螺旋CT腹部血管成像应用研究[J].实用放射学杂志,2005,21(8):843-845. 被引量:20
  • 2Li S,Wang C,Jiang X,et al. Effects of dual-energy CT with non-lin- ear blending on abdominal CT angiography [ J ]. Korean J Radiol, 2014,15:430-438.
  • 3Sehindera ST, Winklehner A, Alkadhi H, et al. Effect of automatic tube voltage selection on image quality and radiation dose in abdomi- nal CT angiography of various body sizes: a phantom study [ J ]. Clin Radio1,2013,68 :e79-86.
  • 4Hara AK, Paden RG, Silva AC. et al. Iterative reconstruction tech- nique for reducing body radiation dose at CT: feasibility study [ J ]. AJ R, 2009,193 : 764 -771.
  • 5Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography-an increasing source of radiation exposure [ J ]. N Enql J Med ,2007,357:2277-2284.
  • 6LaBounty 'I'M, Leipsie J, Poulter R, el al. Coronary. CT angiography of patients with a normal body mass index using 80 kVp versus 100 kVp: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor randomized trial [J]. A JR ,2011,197 : W860-867.
  • 7Huda W, Scalzetti EM, Levin G. Technique factors and image quality as functions of patient weight at abdominal CT [ J ]. Radiolo~', 2000,217:430-435.
  • 8Xu J, Mahesh M,Tsui BM,et al. Is iterative reconstruetion ready for MDCT? [ J ]. J Am Coil Radio1,2009 ,6 :274-276.
  • 9张兆琪,徐磊.重视冠状动脉多层CT成像的低剂量检查[J].中华放射学杂志,2009,43(7):681-683. 被引量:80
  • 10曹建新,王一民,张羽,陶伟,张晓东,王爱军,刘莉,王鹏.联合应用低管电压和对比剂个体化方案进行腹部CT血管成像的研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2012,46(10):902-906. 被引量:27

共引文献63

同被引文献8

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部