期刊文献+

当前论证评价工作的问题研究及优化路径探索

Research on Problems of Current Argument Evaluation Work and E xploration of Optimization Paths
下载PDF
导出
摘要 专家论证评价是论证活动的主要实施方式之一,与传统的经验性决策相比,专家论证评价引入专家参与决策,决策意见是集体智慧的产物。此外,专家论证评价可以综合并运用专家在各自领域积累的知识、经验,能显著提升决策的科学性和规范性。本文对专家论证评价工作机制在相关领域的应用进行了介绍,对当前专家论证评价机制中存在的问题进行分析研究,并就如何构建科学论证评价体系进行了探讨并提出可行性建议。 Expert argument evaluation is one of the main modes of argument activities.Compared with traditional empirical decision,experts are involved in the decision making,which makes the decisions become the results of collective wisdom.Besides,expert argument evaluation can comprehensively utilize the experts’knowledge and experiences accumulated from their respective areas,which can significantly improve the scientificity and normalization of decisions.This paper presents the application of working mechanism of expert argument evaluation in related areas,further analyzes and studies the problems existed in current working mechanism of expert argument evaluation.The paper also discusses the ways to establish system of scientific argument evaluation,and puts forward feasible suggestions.
作者 季凯 蔡薇 JI Kai;CAI Wei(Nanjing Institute of Product Quality Inspection/Nanjing Institute of Quality Development and Advanced Technology Application)
出处 《中国标准化》 2024年第1期189-193,共5页 China Standardization
基金 南京市市场监督管理局科技项目(项目编号:Kj2022001)资助。
关键词 专家 论证评价 决策 工作机制 expert argument evaluation decision making working mechanism
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献55

共引文献55

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部