渤海早期王城的文献学辨正与考古学观察

Historical Literature Study and Archaeological Observations of the Early Capital of Bohai State

探索渤海早期王城,主要是靠两个方面工作的进展和突破,一是文献史料的进一步解析与辨正,二是考古工作进一步开展与深入。从文献史料出发的研讨涉及到“桂娄故地”还是“挹娄故地”,太白山南还是太白山北,山城还是平原城以及“东牟山”“旧国”等问题;从考古学层面的研讨,当下主要集中在磨盘村山城的问题。学术界对磨盘村山城早期遗存的认识仍存在较大争议,当下还很难达成一致,仍需进一步开展相关工作和系统性研究。期待磨盘村山城的田野考古工作继续深入下去,以期全面揭露磨盘村山城的整体情况,也期待前期发掘工作的正式报告尽快出版,为学术界进一步研讨磨盘村山城的年代和性质提供系统翔实的第一手材料。

To study the early capital of Bohai State mainly depends on both the further analysis,judgement and correction of the historical literature,and the archaeological excavation and research.Discussions on the historical literature was related to whether it was the old site of Guilou or Yilou,whether it lied in south of Taibai Mountain or north of Taibai Mountain,whether it was a mountain city site or a city site on plain,and the issues of Dongmoushan and old capital,etc.The archaeological discussions currently focused on the issues of Mopancun Mountain City Site.The academy community can hardly reach an agreement on the cognition of the early phase of Mopancun Mountain City Site,and further related work and systematical researches are required.It is anticipated that the archaeological excavations at Mopancun Mountain City Site should be continuously carried on to overall display the whole picture of Mopancun Mountain City,and the official report of the previous excavations be published as soon as possible,in order to provide the first-hand systematical and accurate materials to further discuss the age and the nature of Mopancun Mountain City.