期刊文献+

特质共情对道德判断的影响:来自ERP的证据

The Influence of Trait Empathy on Moral Judgment:An ERP Study Evidence
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨特质共情对道德判断的影响及其神经机制。方法:先根据44名被试在人际反应指数量表的得分将其分为高、低特质共情组,然后采用事件相关电位技术考察两组被试完成道德判断任务时的行为和脑电指标。结果:行为结果显示,高特质共情组对不道德行为的责备程度大于低特质共情组。脑电结果显示,道德行为比不道德行为诱发了更大的N1、N2波幅和更小的LPP波幅;高特质共情组道德行为的N1波幅大于不道德行为,低特质共情组则无此差异。结论:高特质共情个体对道德刺激更敏感,在道德判断过程中具有道德直觉加工优势。 Objective:To explore the neural mechanisms underlying the impact of trait empathy on moral judgment.Methods:Firstly,44 participants were divided into high and low trait empathy groups based on their Interpersonal Reactivity Index scores.Then,all participants completed the moral judgment task during which their behavioral and neural responses were recorded.Results:Behavioral results showed that individuals in high trait empathy group assigned more blame to immoral behaviors comparing to individuals in low trait empathy group.EEG results showed that moral behaviors induced greater N1 and N2 amplitudes,but smaller LPP amplitudes,than immoral behaviors did.Moreover,for individuals in high trait empathy group,moral behaviors elicited significantly more negative N1 than immoral behaviors did,whereas there was no such dfference for individuals in low trait empathy group.Conclusion:Individuals in high trait empathy group are more sensitive to moral content and have a moral intuition processing advantage during moral judgment.
作者 黄云云 胡平 邓欢 HUANG Yun-yun;HU Ping;DENG Huan(School of Educational Science,Ludong University,Yantai 264025,China;Department of Psychology,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872,China;School of Education,Huaibei Normal University,Huaibei 235000,China)
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2023年第6期1315-1319,共5页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金 全国教育科学规划教育部青年项目(EBA200392)“多感觉整合视角下自闭症的情绪识别及干预研究”。
关键词 特质共情 道德判断 事件相关电位 Trait empathy Moral judgment ERP
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献42

  • 1寇彧,徐华女.移情对亲社会行为决策的两种功能[J].心理学探新,2005,25(3):73-77. 被引量:48
  • 2李同归,加藤和生.成人依恋的测量:亲密关系经历量表(ECR)中文版[J].心理学报,2006,38(3):399-406. 被引量:460
  • 3汪向东 等.心理卫生评定量表手册(增订版)[M].中国心理卫生杂志社,1999,12..
  • 4Davis. A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 1980,10: 85.
  • 5Dymond R. A scale for the measurement of empathic ability. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1949,13 : 127-133.
  • 6Kerr WA,Speroff BG. Validation and evaluation of the empathy test. Journal of Genera/Psychology, 1954,50: 369-376.
  • 7Darrick J,David PF. Empathy and offending: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 2004,9 : 441-476.
  • 8Coffman SL. Empathy as a relevant instructor variable in the experiential classroom. Group and Organization Studies, 1981,6(1) : 114-120.
  • 9Olsen JK. Relationship between nurse-expressed empathy, patient-perceived empathy and patient stress. Image:J N Scholarship, 1996,27 : 317-322.
  • 10Hogan R. Development of an empathy scale. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1969,33:307-316.

共引文献78

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部