期刊文献+

资源类型对绿色消费的影响:时间还是金钱更有效?

The impact of resource type on green consumption:Is time or money more important?
下载PDF
导出
摘要 时间与金钱是两种重要的资源类型,人们在绿色消费的过程中不可避免地会受到这两种资源对认知思维和决策行为的影响。然而,目前对于资源类型影响绿色消费行为的具体机制仍不明确。本研究将时间与金钱引发的认知差异引入绿色消费,一方面,基于解释水平理论与人类价值观,分析了时间资源如何促进绿色消费,以及金钱资源如何抑制绿色消费。另一方面,分别从个体、企业以及产品层面出发,结合实验法探究时间与金钱资源影响绿色消费的边界条件,并引入情绪响应水平、环保自我担当以及感知产品有效性作为中介变量,构建资源类型影响绿色消费的理论模型。研究结论将有助于发挥时间与金钱资源在促进绿色消费过程中的积极作用,同时也为企业利用资源线索引导绿色消费提供了新的思路。 Time and money are two important resource types.Individuals’green consumption behavior is inevitably affected by these two resources in cognitive thinking and decision-making.However,the underlying mechanism of how resource type affects green consumption is still unclear.The present study introduces time and money into the field of green consumption.On the one hand,based on construal level theory and human value,it reveals how time resources promote green consumption and how money resources decrease green consumption.On the other hand,from the perspective of individuals,enterprises,and products,it combines experiments to explore the boundary conditions of time and money affecting green consumption.It further introduces emotional response level,environmental self-responsibility,and product effectiveness perception as mediating factors to build a theoretical framework of the impact of resource type on green consumption.These studies not only explore the positive role of time and money resources in promoting green consumption,but also provide new ideas for companies to use resource type to guide green consumption.
作者 孙瑾 陈晨 SUN Jin;CHEN Chen(International School of Business,University of International Business and Economics,Beijing 100029,China;National Agricultural Exhibition Center,Beijing 100125,China)
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSCD 北大核心 2024年第1期39-57,共19页 Advances in Psychological Science
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(编号:22YJA630075) 国家自然科学基金面上项目(编号:72272033) 北京市社会科学基金青年学术带头人项目(编号:21DTR050)资助。
关键词 绿色消费 时间资源 金钱资源 解释水平 价值观 green consumption time resource money resource construal level human value
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献157

  • 1李纾.艾勒悖论(Allais Paradox)另释[J].心理学报,2001,33(2):176-181. 被引量:17
  • 2张梦霞.消费者购买行为的中西价值观动因比较研究[J].经济管理,2005,31(8):4-11. 被引量:31
  • 3刘飞.炫耀性消费——凡勃伦与布迪厄之比较[J].消费经济,2005,21(3):52-54. 被引量:20
  • 4赵志裕,温静,谭俭邦.社会认同的基本心理历程——香港回归中国的研究范例[J].社会学研究,2005(5):202-227. 被引量:210
  • 5Arkes, H. R., & Blumer, C. (1985). The psychology of sunk cost. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35, 124-140.
  • 6Becker, G. S. (1965). A theory of the allocation of time. Economic Journal, 75, 493-517.
  • 7Brown, T. C. (2005). Loss aversion without the endowment effect, and other explanations for the WTA-WTP disparity. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 57, 367-379.
  • 8Cheema, A., & Soman, D. (2006). Malleable mental accounting: The effect of flexibility on the justification of attractive spending and consumption decisions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16, 33-44.
  • 9Devoe, S. E., & Pfeffer, J. (2007). When time is money: The effect of hourly payment on the evaluation of time. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 104, 1- 13.
  • 10Duxbury, D., Keasey, K., Zhang, H., & Chow, S. L. (2005). Mental accounting and decision making: Evidence under reverse conditions where money is spent for time saved. Journal of Economic Psychology, 26, 567-580.

共引文献452

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部