期刊文献+

妊娠期糖尿病孕妇血清SFRP-4、HSP60水平对不良妊娠结局的预测价值

Serum SFRP-4 and HSP60 levels in pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus and their predictive value for adverse pregnancy outcomes
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨妊娠期糖尿病(gestational diabetes mellitus,GDM)孕妇血清分泌型卷曲相关蛋白-4(secreted frizzled-related protein-4,SFRP-4)、热休克蛋白60(heat shock protein 60,HSP60)水平对不良妊娠结局的预测价值。方法选择2020年6月至2022年8月濮阳市人民医院收治的123例GDM孕妇作为观察组,选择同期在本院进行产检的健康孕妇120例作为对照组。酶联免疫吸附法(ELISA)检测血清SFRP-4、HSP60水平,收集入选人员临床资料,采用Pearson法分析血清SFRP-4、HSP60水平与糖脂代谢指标的相关性,ROC曲线分析血清SFRP-4、HSP60对GDM患者不良妊娠结局诊断价值。结果对照组与GDM组年龄、孕前体质指数(body mass index,BMI)、孕周、孕次及血清高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(high density lipoprotein-cholesterol,HDL-C)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(low density lipoprotein cholesterol,LDL-C)比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);GDM组空腹血糖(fasting blood glucose,FBG)、空腹胰岛素(fasting insulin,FINS)、糖化血红蛋白(glycosylated hemoglobin type A1c,HbA1c)、胰岛素抵抗指数(homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance,HOMA-IR)、甘油三酯(triglyceride,TG)、总胆固醇(total cholesterol,TC)显著高于对照组(6.41±0.73)vs(4.98±0.61)mmol/L、(12.35±2.33)vs(7.61±1.56)mIU/L、(9.34±1.26)%vs(5.74±0.23)%、(3.42±0.55)vs(1.27±0.53)、(1.74±0.82)vs(1.21±0.23)mmol/L、(4.98±1.21)vs(4.57±1.13)mmol/L(P<0.05)。GDM组患者血清SFRP-4、HSP60水平显著高于对照组(5.68±1.78)vs(3.26±0.95)ng/mL、(32.56±6.28)vs(18.42±3.24)ng/mL(P<0.05)。GDM患者血清SFRP-4、HSP60与FBG、FINS、HbA1c、HOMA-IR呈正相关(P<0.05),与TG、TC、HDL-C、LDL-C无关(P>0.05)。与妊娠结局良好组比较,不良组血清SFRP-4、HSP60水平显著升高(7.41±1.62)vs(4.75±1.55)ng/mL、(38.31±5.76)vs(29.47±5.41)ng/mL(P<0.05)。血清SFRP-4、HSP60联合诊断GDM患者不良妊娠结局的AUC为0.931,敏感度为86.05%,特异度为87.50%,联合诊断效能高于单独检测(Z=2.070,P=0.038;Z=2.001,P=0.045)。结论GDM患者血清SFRP-4、HSP60水平升高,与GDM妊娠结局相关,二者联合对GDM患者不良妊娠结局有一定诊断价值。 Objective To investigate the serum levels of secreted frizzled-related protein-4(SFRP-4)and heat shock protein 60(HSP60)in pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus(GDM)and their predictive value for adverse pregnancy outcomes.Methods A total of 123 pregnant women with GDM who were admitted from Jun.2020 to Aug.2022 were collected as the observation group,and 120 healthy pregnant women who underwent obstetric examination in our hospital were gathered as the control group.Serum SFRP-4 and HSP60 levels were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay(ELISA),clinical data of selected persons were collected;Pearson method was used to analyze the correlation between serum SFRP-4 and HSP60 levels and glucose and lipid metabolism indexes;ROC curve was used to analyze the serum SFRP-4 and HSP60 in the diagnosis of adverse pregnancy outcomes in patients with GDM.Results There were no obvious differences in age,pre-pregnancy BMI,gestational age,pregnancy times,and serum HDL-C or LDL-C between the control group and the GDM group(P>0.05).FBG,FINS,HbA1c,HOMA-IR,TG,and TC in GDM group were obviously higher than those in control group[(6.41±0.73)vs(4.98±0.61)mmol/L,(12.35±2.33)vs(7.61±1.56)mIU/L,(9.34±1.26)vs(5.74±0.23)%,(3.42±0.55)vs(1.27±0.53),(1.74±0.82)vs(1.21±0.23)mmol/L,(4.98±1.21)vs(4.57±1.13)mmol/L](P<0.05).The levels of serum SFRP-4 and HSP60 in the GDM group were obviously higher than those in the control group[(5.68±1.78)vs(3.26±0.95)ng/mL,(32.56±6.28)vs(18.42±3.24)ng/mL](P<0.05);Serum SFRP-4 and HSP60 in GDM patients were positively correlated with FBG,FINS,HbA1c,and HOMA-IR(P<0.05),but had nothing to do with TG,TC,HDL-C,and LDL-C(P>0.05).Compared with the good pregnancy outcome group,the serum SFRP-4 and HSP60 levels in the poor group were obviously increased[(7.41±1.62)vs(4.75±1.55)ng/mL,(38.31±5.76)vs(29.47±5.41)ng/mL](P<0.05).The AUC of serum SFRP-4 combined HSP60 to diagnose adverse pregnancy outcomes in GDM patients was 0.931,with a sensitivity of 86.05% and a specificity of 87.50%.The combined diagnostic performance was higher than that of the single test(Z=2.070,P=0.038;Z=2.001,P=0.045).Conclusions The levels of serum SFRP-4 and HSP60 in GDM patients are increased,which are related to GDM pregnancy outcomes.The combination of the two has certain diagnostic value for adverse pregnancy outcomes in GDM patients.
作者 孙俊红 张方方 张丽媛 李雷花 Sun Junhong;Zhang Fangfang;Zhang Liyuan;Li Leihua(Department of Clinical Laboratory,Puyang People’s Hospital,Puyang 457000,China)
出处 《中华内分泌外科杂志》 CAS 2023年第6期711-715,共5页 Chinese Journal of Endocrine Surgery
基金 2020年河南医学科技奖(9412019Y1675)。
关键词 妊娠期糖尿病 分泌型卷曲相关蛋白-4 热休克蛋白60 Gestational diabetes mellitus Secreted frizzled-related protein-4 Heat shock protein 60
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献95

  • 1马晓丽,李莲英.血清RBP4、Visfatin和VEGF在妊娠期糖尿病孕妇中的表达及其和围生儿结局的关系[J].中国妇产科临床杂志,2020,0(1):81-82. 被引量:30
  • 2Kahn CR.Joslin糖尿病学[M].14版.潘长玉,主译.北京:人民卫生出版社,2005:550-552.
  • 3中华医学会妇产科学分会产科学组,中华医学会围产医学分会妊娠合并糖尿病协作组.妊娠合并糖尿病临床诊断与治疗推荐指南(草案)[J].中华妇产科杂志,2007,42:426-428.
  • 4中华人民共和国国家卫生部.WS331-2011妊娠期糖尿病诊断[s]北京:中华人民共和国国家卫生部,2011.
  • 5International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy 3tudy Groups Consensus Panel,Metzger BE,Gabbe SG, et al. International association of diabetes and pregnancy study groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy[J].Diabetes Care,2010,33:676-682.
  • 6International Diabetes Federation. Global Guideline on Pregnancy and Diabetes[S].Brussels: International Diabetes Federation,2009.
  • 7Walker JD. Diabetes in pregnancy:management of diabetes and its complications from pre-conception to the postnatal period. NICE guideline 63. London, March 2008[J]. Diabet Med, 2008, 25: 1025-1027.
  • 8Hoffman L,Nolan C,Wilson JD,et al.Gestational diabetes mellitus-management guidellnes.The Australasian Diabetes in Pregnancy Society[J].Med J Aust, 1998,169:93-97.
  • 9Canadian Diabetes Association.2008 CDA clinical practiceguidelines for the prevention and management of diabetes in Canada[J].Can J Diabetes,2008,32:S168-180.
  • 10Hadar E,Oats J,Hod M.Towards new diagnostic criteria for diagnosing GDM:the HAPO study[J].J Perinat Med, 2009, 37: 447-449.

共引文献1562

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部