期刊文献+

染色体微阵列分析及全外显子测序在胎儿遗传学诊断中的应用

CMA and WES technique in fetal ultrasound abnormalities application value analysis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨染色体微阵列分析技术(CMA)及外显子组测序技术(WES)在胎儿遗传学诊断中的应用价值。方法回顾性分析本院2018~2022年共1318例胎儿羊水的CMA检测结果及2020~2022年共103例超声异常但CMA结果正常的胎儿WES检测结果,从多角度分析不同临床指征下CMA及WES阳性诊断率的差异。结果1318例胎儿羊水病例中,CMA检出率(14.8%)高于核型分析检出率(9.2%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);103例超声提示胎儿结构异常但CMA检测结果正常的胎儿样本加行WES检测,阳性率为21.4%.结论与传统核型分析相比,CMA检测提高了染色体异常的检出率;对超声提示结构异常的胎儿在常规核型和CMA检测结果为阴性时,WES可作为提高检出率的一种有效方法。 Objective To investigate the value and feasibility of Chromosomal Microarray Analysis(CMA)and Whole Exome Sequencing(WES)in the diagnosis of prenatal ultrasound abnormalities.Methods CMA test results of 1318 fetal amniotic fluid from 2018 to 2022,WES test results of 103 cases and 103 fetuses with abnormal ultrasound results from 2020 to 2022,and the correlation between clinical indication and CMA and WES positive diagnosis from multiple perspectives.Results A total of 195 pathogenic variants were detected in 1318 CMA cases,accounting for 14.80%;6.04%compared with karyotype analysis(8.76%),the positive rate of CMA diagnosis increased;WES test was applied to 103 fetal samples with fetal structural abnormalities but normal CMA test results,and 22 positive cases were detected,with a positive rate of 21.4%.Conclusion Compared with conventional karyotyping,CMA can further improve the detection rate of chromosomal abnormalities in the conventional karyotyping and CMA test.
作者 刘亚男 张胜利 徐彩霞 陶华娟 LIU Yanan;ZHANG Shengli;XU Caixia;TAO Huajuan(Department of Genetics,Weifang Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital,Weifang 261000,China)
出处 《潍坊医学院学报》 2023年第6期455-457,共3页 Acta Academiae Medicinae Weifang
关键词 超声异常 产前诊断 CMA WES Ultrasound abnormality Prenatal diagnosis CMA WES
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献48

  • 1沈婷,唐红菊,刘海意,乔福元,刘玉凌,吴行飞.性染色体异常核型37例细胞遗传学分析[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2006,22(4):285-286. 被引量:8
  • 2许争峰,胡娅莉,张建伟,朱瑞芳,茹彤,刘启兰,顾燕,张颖,仲晓玲.9例18三体综合征胎儿的产前诊断[J].中华围产医学杂志,2006,9(5):291-293. 被引量:14
  • 3Ohr H, Bui AQ, Le BH, et al.Identification of putative Arabidopsis DEMETER target genes by GeneChip analysis[J]. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2007, 364 (4) :856-860.
  • 4Borel N, Kempf E, Hotzel H, et al. Direct identification of chlamydiae from clinical samples using a DNA microarray assay :a vatidation study [J]. Mol CeLl Probes, 2008, 22 ( 1 ) :55-64.
  • 5Schena M, Shalon D, Davis RW, et al. Quantitative monitoring of gene expression patterns with a complementary DNA microarray[J]. Science, 1995, 270 (5235) :467-470.
  • 6Pirrung M C. Spatially Addressable Combinatorial Libraries[J]. Chem Rev, 1997,97 (2) :473-488.
  • 7Pinkel D, Segraves R, Sudar D, et al. High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays[J]. Nat Genet, 1998,20 (2) :207-211.
  • 8Vialard F, Molina Gomes D, Leroy B, et al. Array comparative genomic hybridization in prenatal diagnosis another experience[J]. Fetal Diagn Ther, 2009, 25 (2) :277-284.
  • 9Redon R, Ishikawa S, Fitch KR, et al. Global variation in copy number in the human genome[J]. Nature, 2006,444 (7118) : 444-454.
  • 10Coppinger J, Alliman S, Lamb A N, et al. Whole-genome microarray analysis in prenatal specimens identifies clinically significant chromosome alteration without increase in results of unclear significance compared to targeted microarray[J]. Prenatal Diagnosis, 2009,29 (12) : 1156-1166.

共引文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部