摘要
改革开放后,胡乔木全面系统地阐述中共党史的重大问题,明确提出中共党史的书写应在总结经验教训的基础上,为科学的政治建设服务,成为思想斗争的理论武器。在对党史问题的阐释上,胡乔木提出,运用科学态度、科学方法、科学论证来阐述党史的各种根本问题,生动、丰富的党史书写应回归党史本身的研究。胡乔木认为,以论代史的书写方式不能反映党史的全貌,只有明晰党史发展的脉络、在宏观叙事过程中展现党史重要人物与事件、重新探究被以往视角遮蔽的历史过程,才能全面、准确地进行党史书写。
After the reform and opening-up,Hu Qiaomu offered a systematic overview of significant issues in Communist Party History.He argued that,based on critical examination of lessons from the past,the writing of Communist Party History should serve the scientific development of politics and become a theoretical weapon for ideological struggle.He argued that one should embrace scientific views and adopt scientific methods to scientifically interpretating various fundamental issues in the history of the Party.He also called a return from the vivid and rich style in writing to the fundamental questions in Party History.He believed that historical narratives could not offer a comprehensive view of Party History.Only by clarifying its dominant themes,exhibiting its significant personalities and events within macro narratives,and re-exploring the historical processes that were overlooked in previous research approaches,could the writing of Party History return to its original course.
出处
《史学理论研究》
北大核心
2023年第6期136-146,160,共12页
Historiography Bimonthly