案例分析·口述历史·体认表达——当代中国民族传统体育研究的三种路径

Case Study,Oral History and Cognitive Expression——Three Paths of Contemporary National Traditional Sports Research in China

当代我国民族传统体育研究的过程中,学科交叉与融合致使研究方法“跨界”。文章对案例分析、口述历史、体认表达等3种“当红”民族传统体育研究方法进行了反思,提出:当代我国民族传统体育中案例研究目的不是单纯对案例的描述阐释,更为重要的是深层挖掘和理论建构;口述历史是史学工作者需对口述史料加以注释、认证、说明的成果;体认表达的理性化指“体认”应立足于西方认知理论的逻辑起点。同时,应聚焦于强化研究方法的规范与完整,关注于研究问题之上选取恰当的研究方法,注重于围绕研究问题合理地选择和组织事实材料,专注于注重证据链的形成与研究问题的解决。

In the research process of traditional national sports in China,the fusion of disciplines leads to the use of“cross-disciplinary”approach.This present study reflects on case analysis,oral history and recognition expression—the three“popular”research methods of traditional national sports—and proposes that:the purpose of applying case study to traditional national sports research is not simply to describe and explain the cases,but to make in-depth analysis and construct theories;oral history is the result from historiographers’annotation,verification,and explanation to historical materials;the rationalization of cognitive expression means that“cognition”should be based on the logical starting point of western cognitive theories.At the same time,the standardization and completeness of research question presuppositions,the choice of research methods appropriate for research questions,the selection and organization of facts and materials;and the formation of evidence chain and the solution of research questions are also worth our attention.