摘要
网络服务提供者的注意义务在算法时代的扩张设想,源自技术变革引发的提供者中立地位改变。注意义务隶属于“避风港-红旗规则”,该规则的独立价值需回溯民事权利体系推导。义务扩张的核心是民事侵权救济下的二元规制路径,“避风港规则”与“红旗规则”关系的认识以过错为区分要件,且分属支配力回复救济与支配力回复救济、损害赔偿救济的统合。结合《民法典》具体规定,注意义务扩张的程度,宜重“停止侵害”而非“妨害防止”的支配力回复性民事救济。语义表述上,不宜过多争论注意义务、审查义务与过滤义务的概念区分。
The expansion of the duty of care of network service providers in the era of algorithms originates from the change of provider neutrality caused by technological change.The duty of care is subject to the“safe harbor-red flag principle”,the independent value of which needs to be derived from the civil rights system.The core of obligation expansion is the dual regulation path under tort relief.The understanding of the relationship between“safe harbor principle”and“red flag principle”takes fault as the distinguishing element and belongs to the integration of control recovery relief,control recovery relief and damage compensation relief.According to the specific provisions of the Civil Code,the degree of expansion of the duty of care should focus on the controlling power of“stopping the infringement”rather than“preventing the nuisance”.In terms of semantic expression,it is not appropriate to argue too much about the concept of duty of care,duty of review and duty of filtering.
出处
《电子知识产权》
2023年第11期42-50,共9页
Electronics Intellectual Property
基金
“中国人民大学2022年度拔尖人才创新培育资助计划”成果
国家社会科学基金青年项目“知识产权程序规则国际一体化的中国应对研究”(项目号:22CFX080)资助。
关键词
算法
网络服务提供者
避风港规则
过滤义务
侵权责任
Algorithm Technology
Network Service Providers
Safe Harbor Principle
Filtering Obligation
Liability for Tort