软硬学科自称语的词汇语法剖面对比研究

A Comparative Study on the Lexico-grammatical Profile of Self-mention between Soft and Hard Disciplines

自称语作为互动元话语资源之一,是凸显作者立场和贡献的主要资源。本文基于自建的软硬学科学术论文语料库,探究自称语we在软硬学科间词汇语法剖面上的使用异同。研究发现:(1)硬学科使用自称语we的频率显著高于软学科;(2)在词汇语法剖面上,硬学科更注重使用表示逻辑顺序的副词和连词构建篇章,增强文本的逻辑性;硬学科比软学科使用的词块数量多,且功能更加丰富;软硬学科都倾向于使用积极语义韵,但软学科使用消极语义韵的频率略高于硬学科。本研究系统阐释了软硬学科间自称语的使用异同,以期为学术论文写作提供借鉴。

As one of the interactional metadiscourse resources,self-mention is the main resource for expressing the author's position and highlighting the author's contribution.Based on the self-built corpus of academic papers of soft and hard disciplines,this paper explores the similarities and differences in the use of the self-mention term "we" in the lexico-grammatical profile between soft and hard disciplines.The study finds:(1) The self-mention term "we" has a higher frequency in hard discipline,and there is a significant difference between the two;(2) In terms of lexico-grammatical profile,hard discipline utilizes more adverbs and conjunctions to enhance the logical relation of the text;the functions of lexical bundles in hard discipline are more diverse;both soft and hard disciplines tend to employ positive semantic prosody,but soft discipline utilizes negative prosody more frequently than hard discipline.This research systematically explains the similarities and differences in the use of self-mention between soft and hard disciplines in order to provide reference for academic writing.