期刊文献+

基于FMECA的LIMS风险评估在药物安全性评价流程中的应用研究

Application of FMECA Based on LIMS Risk Assessment in Drug Safety Evaluation Process
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨药物安全评价研究机构对实验室信息管理系统(LIMS)实施风险评估的方法,并基于评估结果制定措施降低风险,确保研究质量。方法:采用“故障模式、影响和危害性分析”(FMECA)方法,对LIMS实施整体的风险评估。首先确定风险评估的目的、范围、依据和评估工具,并建立风险评估组织,根据风险评估流程对LIMS实施的整体合规性风险评估过程进行梳理。结果与结论:通过对系统实施的整体合规性评估明确了风险来源,发现了会影响研究质量的风险,并制定了降低风险措施以保证系统的整体合规要求,进一步提升了药物安全评价研究的数据质量。FMECA方法可应用在用于药物安全性评价研究流程中的LIMS,对提升数据质量有很好的帮助。 Objective:To explore the risk assessment methods for laboratory information management systems(LIMS) implemented by drug safety evaluation research institutions,and develop measures based on the assessment results to reduce risks in the process and ensure research quality.Methods:Using the "Failure Mode,Effects,and Criticality Analysis"(FMECA) method,conduct an overall risk assessment of the LIMS.Firstly,determine the purpose,scope,basis,and evaluation tools of risk assessment,and establish a risk assessment organization to sort out the overall compliance risk assessment process of LIMS implementation based on the risk assessment process.Results and Conclusion:Through the overall compliance assessment of the system implementation,the sources of risks were identified,risks that could af fect the quality of research were identified,and risk reduction measures were developed to ensure the overall compliance requirements of the system,further improving the data quality of drug safety evaluation research.The FMECA method can be applied to LIMS used in drug safety evaluation research processes,which is very helpful in improving data quality.
作者 张曦 刘晓萌 赵曼曼 于连东 耿兴超 谢寅 Zhang Xi;Liu Xiaomeng;Zhao Manman;Yu Liandong;Geng Xingchao;Xie Yin(National Institutes for Food and Drug Control,Beijing 102629,China)
出处 《中国药事》 2023年第12期1421-1430,共10页 Chinese Pharmaceutical Affairs
关键词 数据质量 计算机化系统 风险评估 实验室信息管理系统 data quality computerized systems risk assessment LIMS
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献34

  • 1赖婉枫,解馨.“质量风险管理”在GMP管理过程中的应用[J].中国食品药品监管,2010(6):60-65. 被引量:15
  • 2梁毅.新版GMP教程[M].北京:中国医药科技出版社,2011.9:178.
  • 3国家食品药品监督管理局药品安全监管司 国家食品药品监督管理局药品认证管理中心.药品生产验证指南(2003)[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2003.471.
  • 4ICH Expert Working Group, International Confe rence on Harmonisation of Technical Requireme- nts for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. Quality Risk Management Q9 [S]. Gen-eva, 2005.
  • 5T. Frank, S. Brooks, R. Creekmore3, B. Hasselbalch K. Murray, K. Obeng6, S. Reich5, E. Sanchez. Quality Risk Management Principles and Industry Case Studies [EB/OL]. http://www. pqri. org/pdfs/MTC/ Ouality_Risk_Management_Principles_and_Indus -try_Case_Studies_December_28_2008. pdf.
  • 6Kristin S. Murray, Stephen Reich. Ouality Risk Man agement (ORM) Tool Selection: Getting to Right First Time [J].Pharmaceutical Engineering, 2011, 31 (4) : 1-6.
  • 7International Conference on Harmonisation of Te- chnical Requirements for Registration of Phar- maceuticals for Human Use. Q9 Briefing Pack[EB/ OL]. http://www, ich. org/products/guide-lines/ quality/q9-briefing-pack, html.
  • 8卫生部令第79号.药品生产质量管理规范(2010年修订)[S],2011.
  • 9PIC/S. Good Practices forComputerized Systems in Regulated "GxP" Environments PI 011-3[S],2007.
  • 10ISPE Baseline Pharmaceutical Engineering Guide Volume 5:Commissioning and Qualificat ion[S],2000.

共引文献42

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部