新时代我国竞技体育发展中政社关系改革的几点思考

Thoughts on the Reform of the Relationship between Government and Society in the Development of Competitive Sports in China in the New Era

为更好适应新时代社会主要矛盾变化,建构我国竞技体育发展新格局,采用文献资料法和访谈法对我国竞技体育发展中政社关系改革问题进行分析。认为,我国竞技体育发展中强政府、弱社会的发展惯性仍需进一步打破,社会自组织的发展能力有待提高,政府管理的角色和职能亟需转变。新时代我国竞技体育发展需重视政社关系改革,从强政府、弱社会转变为强政府、大社会发展格局,政府引导社会力量有序发展,并与社会力量合作构建多元治理机制。具体包括:深化“放管服”改革,竞技体育“举国体制”继续做减法;社会力量加强自身建设,在更多领域发挥更大作用;依据经济发展的阶段性特征,有针对性地扶持社会力量成长;根据参与类别,对社会力量发展提供差异化的帮扶;做好市场监管,引导、规范社会力量成长;积极推进政府元治理、行业自治和多元共治。

In order to better adapt to the changes of the main social contradictions in the new era and construct a new pattern of competitive sports development in China,this paper analyzes the reform of the relationship between government and society in the development of competitive sports in China by means of literature and interview.It is believed that the development inertia of strong government and weak society in the development of competitive sports in China still needs to be further broken,the development ability of social self-organization needs to be improved,and the role and function of government management need to be changed.In the new era,the development of competitive sports in China needs to pay attention to the reform of the relationship between government and society,from a strong government and a weak society to a strong government and a big social development pattern.The government guides the orderly development of social forces and cooperates with social forces to build a pluralistic governance mechanism.Specifically,it includes deepening the reform of“decentralization,management and service”,continuing to subtract the“national system”of competitive sports,strengthening social forces’own construction,and playing a greater role in more areas.According to the stage characteristics of economic development,we should support the growth of social forces in a targeted manner.According to the type of participation,we should provide differentiated assistance for the development of social forces,do a good job in market supervision,guidance and standardization the growth of social forces,and actively promote government meta-governance,industry autonomy and multi-governance.