期刊文献+

不同化学指示卡对压力蒸汽消毒效果评价准确度的比较

Accuracy comparison of different chemical indicators in evaluation of pressure steam disinfection effect
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较不同类型化学指示卡对医疗废物包装袋内的压力蒸汽消毒效果评价的准确度。方法以生物监测法为金标准,验证不同类型的6种化学指示卡在单层和双层医疗废物包装袋内消毒效果评价结果的一致性。结果本研究共开展模拟试验92袋次,单层与双层医疗废物包装袋模拟试验分别为51袋次与41袋次。单层医疗废物包装袋内,产品3-6的一致性较高,Kappa值均>0.6(P值均<0.001);灵敏度分别为84.2%、94.7%、86.8%,78.9%,特异度分别为92.3%、76.9%、100.0%和100.0%。双层医疗废物包装袋内,产品4的一致性最高,Kappa值为0.788(P<0.001),灵敏度为97.4%,特异度为100.0%,其余化学指示卡的Kappa值均<0.4。结论纸质不覆膜化学指示卡易受冷凝水影响,在监测过程中容易发生指示卡变色异常、不均匀,甚至断裂的情况,对医疗废物包装袋内消毒效果的验证能力不太理想。在开展高致病性医疗废物压力蒸汽消毒工作前,根据不同的监测环境选择适合的化学指示卡对于消毒效果评价准确度判断有重要意义。 Objective This paper aims to compare the accuracy of different types of chemical indicators in evaluation of pres-sure steam disinfection effect in medical waste packaging bags.Methods The biological monitoring method was used as the gold standard,and the consistency of evaluation results of six different types of chemical indicators was verified both in single-layer and double-layer medical waste packaging bags.Results A total of 92 bags were simulated in this study,and 51 bags and 41 bags were simulated in single-layer and double-layer medical waste packaging bags,respectively.In single-layer medical waste packaging bags,the consistency of products 3-6 was high,with the Kappa value higher than 0.6(P<0.001).The sensitivity was 84.2%,94.7%,86.8%and 78.9%,respectively,and the specificity was 92.3%,76.9%,100.0%and 100.0%,respectively.In double-layer medical waste packaging bags,product 4 showed the highest consistency with the Kappa value of 0.788(P<0.001),and the sensitivity and specificity were 97.4%and 100.0%,respectively.The Kappa values of other chemical indicators were all lower than O.4.Conclusion Non-waterproof chemical indicators are susceptible to condensation water,and abnormal discoloration,uneven discoloration,and even breakage of the indicator card are easy to occur in the monitoring process,so their verification ability of the disinfection effect in the medical waste packaging bag is poor.Before carrying out pressure steam disinfection on highly pathogenic medical waste,it is of great significance to select suitable chemical indicators according to different monitoring environments for the accuracy of disinfection effect evaluation.
作者 陈冰冰 金慧 王慧敏 冷坤坤 CHEN Bing-bing;JIN Hui;WANG Hui-min;LENG Kun-kun(Infectious Disease Control Center,Hangzhou Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention,Zhejiang 310021,Chin)
出处 《中国卫生检验杂志》 CAS 2023年第22期2710-2712,共3页 Chinese Journal of Health Laboratory Technology
基金 杭州市医药卫生科技项目(A20210350)。
关键词 压力蒸汽灭菌器 化学指示卡 生物监测法 医疗废物 Pressure steam sterilizer Chemical indicators Biological monitoring method Medical waste
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献54

  • 1沈瑾,张流波.压力蒸汽灭菌器的研究进展[J].中国消毒学杂志,2007,24(3):271-274. 被引量:26
  • 2.消毒技术规范[S].[S].中华人民共和国卫生部,2002,11..
  • 3ISO11140-1 Sterilization of health care products-Chemical indicators[S].2005.
  • 4国家质量监督检验检疫总局.GB8599-2008大型蒸汽灭菌器技术要求自动控制型[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2008.
  • 5ISO18472:2006 Sterilization of health care products-Biological and chemical indicators-Test equipment[S].2006.
  • 6张燕,王亚丽,陆云.手术室对植入性器械包紧急放行时的管理[J].医学信息,2013,26(2):35.
  • 7ISO11140-1:2005 Sterilization of health care products-Chemical indicators-Part 1:General requirements[S].Geniva:ISO,2006:3-5.
  • 8Sterilization of health care products-Biological indicators-Part1:General requirements,2nd ed.Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation.ANSI/AAMI/ISO.2006:11138.
  • 9中华人民共和国卫生部.WS310.3-2009清洗消毒及灭菌效果监测标准[S].北京:人民卫生出版社,2009.
  • 10Karwath P,Sartor J,Gries W,et al.Steam sterilization and automatic dispensing of flude oxyglucose(FDG)for injection[J].Appl Radiat Isot,2005,62(4):577-586.

共引文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部