肾结石患者报告结局测评量表的汉化及信效度检验

Translation of Chinese version of the patient reported outcome measurementin patients with renal stone and its reliability and validity test

目的 汉化剑桥肾结石患者报告结局(PRO)测评量表(CReSP),并对其进行信效度检验,以期为临床评估肾结石PRO提供特异性量表。方法 对原量表进行翻译-回译-跨文化调试-预实验,形成中文版量表。于2021年8月-2022年4月选取我院420例肾结石患者作为研究对象进行调查研究,验证量表的信效度。结果 中文版CReSP共包括6个维度、14个条目。量表各条目的内容效度指数为0.80~1.00,量表内容效度指数为0.79;提取公因子共6个,方差累计贡献率为78.602%;Promax斜交旋转后各条目因子载荷量为0.650~0.989,验证性因子分析结果显示模型适配度良好。量表及各个维度Cronbach′s α系数为0.859~0.959;其重测信度为0.804~0.941。结论 中文版CReSP具有良好的信效度,可作为肾结石PRO的特异性评价工具。

Objective To translate the Cambridge Renal Stone Patient Reported Outcome(PRO)Scale to Chinese and test its reliability,in order to provide a specific scale for clinical assessment of renal stone(CReSP).the Cambridge Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Kidney Stones(CReSP)into Chinese and test its reliability and validity,in order to provide a specific scale for clinical assessment of patient-reported outcomes of kidney stones.Methods The source scale was translated,back-translated,cross-culturally debugged,and pre-experimented to form the Chinese version of the scale.A total of 420 kidney stone patients were selected as the research objects to verify the reliability and validity of the scale from August 2021 to April 2022.Results The Chinese version of CReSP consisted of 6 dimensions and 14 items.The content validity index of each entry of the scale was 0.80~1.00,and the content validity index of the scale was 0.79;The total number of extracted common factors was 6,and the cumulative contribution of variance was 78.602%;The factor loadings of each entry after Promax oblique rotation ranged from 0.650~0.989,and the results of validation factor analysis showed that the model fit was good.The scale and each dimension Cronbach'sαcoefficients were 0.859~0.959,and its retest reliability was 0.804~0.941.Conclusion The Chinese version of CReSP has good reliability and validity,and can be used as a specific evaluation tool for renal stone.