摘要
“行政法律责任单独保留+引致性民事、刑事法律责任条款”的技术路径难以形成教育法典法律责任的规范构造。应根据教育法的属性来研判这一议题。问题导向的立法模式和教育法律关系性质的多元化,决定了教育法典应属领域法典。篇章体例方面,法律责任“总则专章+分则补充”的篇章体例更有助于维系领域型教育法典的体系性。编纂理路方面,应遵循领域型法典法律责任固有的编纂理路:首先,分类处理既有责任条款,包括运用引致性条款规定民事与刑事责任,运用引致性条款和具体责任条款规定行政责任;其次,增补一般性责任条款,彰显教育法典的基本价值理念,并实现教育法典与其他立法的衔接;最后,健全与义务相对应的责任条款,确保教育法典的可诉性。
The proposition of“administrative liability being reserved+civil and criminal causative clause”makes it difficult to form a normative construction of legal liability for Education Code.This issue should be studied based on the attributes of education law.The problem-oriented legislative model and the diversification of the nature of educational legal relationships determine that Education Code is a field of law.The chapter style of“general provisions and supplementary provisions”for legal liability is more helpful in maintaining the systematic nature of Education Code as a field of law.In terms of compilation method,it should follow the compilation method of field of laws:firstly,use causative clause to regulate civil and criminal liability and use causative clause and specific liability clauses to regulate administrative liability;secondly,add general liability clauses to highlight the value of Education Code and achieve the connection between Education Code and other legislations;finally,improve the liability clauses corresponding to obligations and enhance the justiciability of Education Code.
作者
刘旭东
LIU Xudong(Jiangsu Normal University,Xuzhou 221116;Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing 210097)
出处
《中国高教研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2023年第12期32-39,共8页
China Higher Education Research
基金
2022年国家社会科学基金教育学一般课题“我国教育法典编纂的框架体系研究”(BAA220169)
江苏师范大学2022年博士学位教师科研支持项目“研究生培养‘分流退出’机制研究”(22XFRS007)的研究成果。
关键词
领域法
教育法典
法律责任
篇章体例
编纂理路
field of law
Education Code
legal liability
chapter style
compilation method