摘要
劳动法制定中的体系化与法典化是两个互相有联系的不同命题。法典化取决于法与法律有机体的关系,具有对外封闭与对内自洽的属性,通过对法国与俄罗斯两部劳动法典的历史溯源,可以看到劳动法并不必然与法典化相联系。体系化取决于法与社会有机体的关系,主要反映社会化的要求,具有对外开放与对内多元的特点。社会有机体是按问题与对策的逻辑生成的,契约社会、团体社会、福利社会的分层关系是关注重点,应然的社会政策法涉及三种权力与三种权利的关系。劳动法能否转化为劳动法典,取决于法律有机体与社会有机体的相互关系,两个有机体的重合部分也成为法典化与体系化聚焦点。社会化与法典化的良性关系是劳动法典产生的前提,目前我国尚未达到这一条件。劳动法典编纂要向后代负责,要防止将阻力当作助力、限制条件当作促进条件来理解的现象。
The systematization and codification in labor law are two different propositions related to each other.Codification depends on the relationship between law and legal organism,and has the nature of being closed externally and self-consistent internally.It can be seen that labor law is not necessarily associated with codification through the historical tracing of both French labor code and Russian labor code.Systematization depends on the relationship between law and social organism,which mainly reflects the requirements of socialization and has the characteristics of opening to the outside world and internal pluralism.The social organism is generated according to the logic of problems and countermeasures.The hierarchical relationship of contractual society,group society and welfare society are the primary focus,and the social policy law that should be concerned involves the relationship between three kinds of power and three kinds of rights.Whether labor law can be transformed into labor code depends on the interrelation between legal organism and social organism,and the overlapping part of the two organisms also becomes the focus of codification and systematization.The good relationship between socialization and codification is the prerequisite for the production of labor code,while there is not reached in our country at present.The codification of labor code should be accountable to offspring,and should prevent the phenomenon of taking resistance as help and regarding restrictive conditions as facilitating conditions.
作者
董保华
Dong Baohua(Law School,East China Normal University,Shanghai 200241)
出处
《浙江社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2024年第1期67-80,157,158,共16页
Zhejiang Social Sciences