期刊文献+

裁量基准二阶构造的法理展开 被引量:1

Jurisprudential Analysis of the Second-order Structure of Discretion Benchmark
下载PDF
导出
摘要 现代社会的高阶立法主要是一种框架秩序,行政机关制定和适用裁量基准时享有二阶裁量空间,裁量基准兼具法制定与法适用的双重属性。但是,上位法规范和一般法原则仍对这种二阶裁量有框架拘束力,故行政裁量基准制度的统合法理是“行政自主与法律拘束的统一”。这一法理既是行政裁量之治的核心要义,也是司法监督执法裁量理由的基本准据。行政规章和规范性文件都是我国裁量基准的载体,但目前规范性文件趋同化程度较高,宜加强地方政府规章的立法表达,形成层级裁量基准体系。 The high-level legislation in modern society is mainly a framework order,and the administrative organs enjoy the second-order discretion space when formulating and applying the discretion benchmark,which has the dual attributes of law formulation and law application.However,the norms of the superior law and the principles of the general law still have a framework binding force on this second-order discretion,so the unified principle of the discretion benchmark system is“the unity of administrative autonomy and legal restraint.”This jurisprudence is not only the core essence of the rule of administrative discretion,but also the basic field of judicial supervision and law enforcement discretion reasons.Both administrative regulations and normative documents are carriers of China’s discretionary benchmark,but at present,the normative documents are highly convergent,so it is appropriate to strengthen the legislation of local government regulations in the field of law enforcement in order to form a hierarchical discretionary benchmark system.
作者 刘义 Liu Yi(Law School,China Jiliang University,Hangzhou 310018)
出处 《浙江社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2024年第1期81-91,158,共12页 Zhejiang Social Sciences
基金 国家社科基金一般项目“行政立法裁量的合宪性控制体系研究”(21BFX168) 2023年度中国法学会部级法学研究课题“新时代行政裁量基准的法治优化研究”(CLS[2023]B04)。
关键词 行政裁量 裁量基准 行政自主 法律拘束 地方政府规章 administrative discretion discretion benchmark administrative autonomy legal restraint local government regulations
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献186

共引文献156

同被引文献21

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部