期刊文献+

利多卡因联合全身麻醉在支气管镜检查患者中的应用效果

Application effects of Lidocaine combined with general anesthesia in patients undergoing bronchoscopy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:观察利多卡因联合全身麻醉在支气管镜检查患者中的应用效果。方法:回顾性分析2022年3月至2023年3月该院收治的116例行支气管镜检查患者的临床资料,按麻醉方案不同将其分为观察组与对照组各58例。对照组采用全身麻醉,观察组采用利多卡因联合全身麻醉,比较两组麻醉效果、支气管镜检查时间、麻醉苏醒时间,不同时间点[麻醉前(T0)、麻醉后1 min(T_(1))、支气管镜进入声门时(T_(2))、取活检组织时(T_(3))、麻醉苏醒时(T_(4))]血流动力学指标[平均动脉压(MAP)、心率]水平,麻醉前、检查后应激反应指标[促肾上腺皮质激素(ACTH)、皮质醇(Cor)、丙二醛(MDA)]水平,以及不良事件发生率。结果:观察组麻醉优良率为94.83%(55/58),高于对照组82.76%(48/58),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组支气管镜检查时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组麻醉苏醒时间短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);T_(1)时,两组MAP、心率水平均低于T0时,但观察组高于对照组;T_(2)~T_(3)时,观察组MAP、心率水平均低于对照组,T_(4)时,观察组MAP水平高于对照组,两组心率水平均高于T0时,但观察组低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);检查后,两组Cor、MDA、ACTH水平均高于麻醉前,但观察组低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组不良反应发生率为10.34%(6/58),低于对照组的34.48%(20/58),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:利多卡因联合全身麻醉应用于支气管镜检查患者可提高麻醉效果,缩短麻醉苏醒时间,稳定血流动力学指标水平,降低应激反应指标水平和不良事件发生率,其效果优于单纯全身麻醉。 Objective:To observe application effects of Lidocaine combined with general anesthesia in patients undergoing bronchoscopy.Methods:The clinical data of 116 patients who underwent bronchoscopy in this hospital from March 2022 to March 2023 were retrospectively analyzed.According to different anesthesia schemes,they were divided into observation group and control group,58 cases in each group.The control group was treated with general anesthesia,while the observation group was treated with Lidocaine combined with general anesthesia.The anesthetic effects,the bronchoscopy time,the anesthesia recovery time,the hemodynamic indexes[mean arterial pressure(MAP),heart rate]levels at different time points[before anesthesia(T0),1 min after anesthesia(T_(1)),bronchoscopy into the glottis(T_(2)),biopsy tissue(T_(3)),anesthesia awake(T_(4))],the stress reaction indexes[adrenocorticotropic hormone(ACTH),cortisol(Cor),malondialdehyde(MDA)]levels before anesthesia and after the examination,and the incidence of adverse events were compared between the two groups.Results:The excellent and good rate of anesthesia in the observation group was 94.83%(55/58),which was higher than that in the control group(82.76%,48/58),and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in the bronchoscopy time between the two groups(P>0.05).The anesthesia recovery time of the observation group was shorter than that of the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).At T_(1),the MAP and heart rate levels of the two groups were lower than those at T0,but those in the observation group were higher than those in the control group;at T_(2)-T_(3),thefluctuation of MAP and heart rate levels in the observation group was smaller than those in the control group;at T_(4),the MAP level of the observation group was higher than that of the control group;the heart rate levels of the two groups were higher than those at T0,but that in the observation group was lower than that in the control group;and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).After the examination,the levels of Cor,MDA and ACTH in the two groups were higher than those before anesthesia,but those in the observation group were lower than those in the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Further,the incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was 10.34%(6/58),which was lower than 34.48%(20/58)in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusions:Lidocaine combined with general anesthesia in the patients undergoing bronchoscopy can improve the excellent and good rate of anesthesia,shorten the anesthesia recovery time,stabilize the level of hemodynamic indexes,reduce the levels of stress reaction indexes and the incidence of adverse reactions.Moreover,it is superior to single general anesthesia.
作者 王雪飞 WANG Xuefei(Department of Pain of Shangqiu First People’s Hospital,Shangqiu 476000 Henan,China)
出处 《中国民康医学》 2024年第1期48-51,共4页 Medical Journal of Chinese People’s Health
关键词 利多卡因 全身麻醉 支气管镜检查 应激反应 血流动力学 不良反应 Lidocaine General anesthesia Bronchoscopy Stress reaction Hemodynamics Adverse reaction
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献126

  • 1张瑞冬,陈锡明,陈煜.芬太尼诱发呛咳的机制、影响因素和预防[J].国际麻醉学与复苏杂志,2006,27(6):369-372. 被引量:51
  • 2韩潮,黄绍强.不同药物对芬太尼呛咳反应的抑制作用[J].复旦学报(医学版),2007,34(1):135-137. 被引量:22
  • 3钟清玲,刘繁荣,熊晶,刘焕兵,胡春林,尹林.肾上腺素持续给药与间断给药对心室纤颤兔血流动力学的影响[J].中国危重病急救医学,2007,19(4):242-243. 被引量:8
  • 4Agarwal A, Gautam S, Nath SS, et al. Comparison of the incidence and severity of cough induced by sufentanil and fentanyl: a prospective, randomized, double - blind study [J]. Anaesthesia, 2007, 62 (12): 1230 - 1232.
  • 5Sun S, Huang SQ. Effects of pretreatment with a small dose of dexmedetomidine on sufentanil -induced cough during anesthetic induction [J]. JAnesth, 2013, 27 (1): 25-28.
  • 6Haji A, Kimura S, Ohi Y. A model of the central regulatory system for cough reflex [J]. Biol Phann Bull, 2013, 36 (4): 501 - 508.
  • 7Reitan JA, Stengurt KB, Wymore ML, ct al. Central vagal control of fentanyl - induced bradycardia during halothane anesthesia [J]. Anesth Ar~alg, 1978, 57 (1): 31- 36.
  • 8Widdicombe JG. Neurophysiology of the cough reflex [J]. Eur Respir J, 1995, 8 (7): 1193 - 1202.
  • 9Spina D, Page CP. Regulating cough through modulation of sensory nerve function in theair- ways [ J]. Pulm Phannacol Ther, 2013, 26 (5) : 486 - 490.
  • 10Fox AJ, Barnes PJ, Urban L, et al. An in- vitro study of the properties of single vagal af- ferents innervating guinea - pig airways [ J ]. J Physiol, 1993, 469 (1) : 21 -35.

共引文献128

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部