“数字人权”的结构整合构想

Conception of Structural Integration of“Digital Human Rights”

信息科技渗透生活世界,而“数字人权”存在概念模糊且话语破碎的问题,亟须进行有效理论整合。“数字人权”多路径解读交织,但由“信息人”立论存在悖论:一是过度概化了人的存在,二是虚构出的“数维坦”导致人权没有根基,三是跨语际概念错位。作为话语的“数字人权”显然比作为概念的“数字人权”更具优势,已然获得了稳固的话语力量,功用上也有助于纾解话语碎片化的困境。其破碎特征可以从法律、法治、法理三种话语载体中显现出来,从而有必要予以整合。作为话语的“数字人权”,围绕数据核心,参考人权话语主体、客体、内容、关系的基本结构,可以从身份、概念、功能、价值四个方面进行整合。“数字人权”通过生产和控制两个操作向度区分为四元关系,规划“数字人权”的谱系建构,可以区隔出四象限结构,而关于数字的人权诉求可以被整合其中。

Information technology penetrates the living world,but“digital human rights”are in urgent need of effective theoretical integration for their concepts are ambiguous and their discourse is fragmented.“Digital human rights”have been interpreted in many ways,but there are paradoxes in the argument of“information man”.Firstly,the existence of human beings is over-generalized;secondly,the imaginary deviathan leads to the lack of foundation for human rights,and thirdly,the concepts are misplaced in translingual contexts.“Digital human rights”as a discourse are clearly more advantageous than they are as a concept,and have already gained solid discourse power,which helps to alleviate the dilemma of discourse fragmentation.Their fragmented characteristics can be seen in the three discourse carriers of law,rule of law and jurisprudence,and thus need to be integrated.As a discourse,“digital human rights”can be integrated in four respects of identity,concept,function,and value,with data as the core and with reference to the basic structure of discourse of human rights in terms of subject,object,content and relationship.They are distinguished into a quaternary relationship through the two operational dimensions of production and control,and their genealogical construction can be planned in a four-quadrant structure,in which human rights claims about digits can be integrated.