从个人与历史的辩证关系再论“十七年文学”--以《红旗谱》《创业史》《青春之歌》为中心

Further Discussion on“Seventeen-year Literature”from the Dialectical Relationship between Individuals and History Centered on Red Flag Spectrum,Entrepreneurial History and Song of Youth

长期以来,学界对“十七年文学”现象褒贬不一。有学者认为“十七年文学”对中国现代文学的建构意义不大,没有再谈论的价值;有学者则认为这一时期的文学是“一场反抗西方的现代性文学实验”,有再批评的空间。长期思维受限,导致“十七年文学”的“文学性”与“意识形态性”相分离,使得整个时期的文学近乎被学界否定。然而,或许正是因为意识形态的介入,个体对于民族国家想象的增强,才使得这一时期的文学获得更为丰富的“国族”叙事,进而从中获得“文学性”的表征。本文将从个体和历史的关系论出发,对“十七年文学”进行解读,力求发现这一时期的文学创作倾向,并给予新的体认与阐释。

For a long time,the academic circles have different opinions on the phenomenon of“Seven-teen-year Literature”.Some scholars believe that the“Seventeen-year Literature”has no meaning to the con-struction of modern Chinese literature and has no value to talk about.Some scholars believe that the literature of this period is“a modern literary experiment against the West”,and there is room for re-criticism.The long-term limitation of thinking cause the separation of“literariness”and“ideology”of“Seventeen-year Lit-erature”,which makes the literature of the whole period almost denied by the academic circles.However,perhaps it is precisely because of the intervention of ideology that the individual's imagination of the nation-state is enhanced,which makes the literature of this period obtain a richer“national”narrative,and then ob-tain the“literariness”representation.This paper will interpret the“Seventeen-year Literature”from the per-spective of the relationship between individuals and history,striving to discover the literary creative tenden-cies of this period and provide new recognition and interpretation.