期刊文献+

出院准备服务在下肢静脉溃疡患者中的应用效果

Effectiveness of discharge preparation services for patients with lower limb venous ulcers
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察出院准备服务在下肢静脉溃疡患者中的应用效果。方法以2022年10月至12月住院的31例患者对照组,采用常规出院方案;以2023年1月至3月住院的31例患者为干预组,实施出院准备服务方案。采用出院准备度量表、压疮愈合计分量表、再入院率、并发症发生情况评价两组干预效果。结果对照组患者出院准备度得分为(144.58±7.69)分,干预组患者出院准备度得分为(152.87±9.45)分,差异有统计学意义(t=3.788,P<0.001)。干预前后压疮愈合计分量表得分差值对照组为(4.97±1.82)分、干预组为(6.97±2.27)分,差异有统计学意义(t=3.827,P<0.001)。对照组与干预组再入院率分别为25.81%、6.45%,差异有统计学意义(χ^(2)=4.292,P=0.038)。对照组与干预组患者浅静脉炎的发生率分别为16.13%、9.68%,差异无统计学意义(χ^(2)=0.574,P=0.449);活动性出血的发生率分别为9.68%、3.23%,差异无统计学意义(χ^(2)=1.069,P=0.301);继发感染的发生率分别为16.13%、3.23%,差异无统计学意义(χ^(2)=2.952,P=0.086)。结论对下肢静脉溃疡患者实施出院准备服务干预可提高其出院准备水平和伤口愈合效果,降低再入院率,进而改善患者健康结局,但对并发症发生率的效果有待验证。
作者 王笑笑 陈晨 王晓玉 尉冠丽 史云霞 Wang Xiaoxiao;Chen Chen;Wang Xiaoyu;Wei Guanli;Shi Yunxia
机构地区 河南省人民医院
出处 《护理与康复》 2024年第1期33-36,42,共5页 Journal of Nursing and Rehabilitation
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献46

  • 1常光其,陈翠菊,陈忠,董国祥,段志泉,符伟国,戈小虎,谷涌泉,管珩,郭平凡,郭曙光,郭伟,姜维良,蒋米尔,金毕,金辉,金星,景在平,赖传善,李鸣,李晓强,李毅清,李震,林勇杰,刘冰,刘昌伟,刘长建,刘鹏,马杰,潘松龄,时德,舒畅,谭最,王劲松,王深明,王玉琦,汪忠镐,吴丹明,吴庆华,吴向未,辛世杰,叶建荣,苑超,张柏根,张福先,张鸿坤,张纪蔚,张小明,赵纪春,赵渝,周晗.慢性下肢静脉疾病诊断与治疗中国专家共识[J].中国血管外科杂志(电子版),2014,6(3):143-151. 被引量:183
  • 2Stotts NA, Rodeheaver GT, Thomas DR, et al. An instrument to measure healing in pressure uleers: development and validation of the Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing ( PUSH ) [ J 1. J Gerontol Med Science, 2001, 56( 12): M795-M799.
  • 3Berlowitz DR, Ratliff C, Cuddigan J, et al. National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel. The PUSH tool: a survey to determine its perceived usefulness~ J~. Advances Skin Wound Care, 2005, 18 (9) : 480-483.
  • 4Hon J, Lagden K, Melaren AM, et al. A prospective multicenter study to validate use of the PUSH in patients with diabetic, ve- nous, and pressure ulcers [ J]. Ostomy Wound Manage, 2010, 56(2) : 26-36.
  • 5Gunes UY. A prospective study evaluating the Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH Tool) to assess stage I1 , stagellI, and stagelV pressure ulcers[ J]. Ostomy Wound Manage, 2009, 55 ( 5 ) : 48-52.
  • 6Gardner SE, Hillis SL, Frantz RA. A repospeetive study of the PUSH tool in diabetic foot ulcers [ J ]. J Wound Ostomy Conti- nence Nurs, 2011, 38(4) : 385-393.
  • 7National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel and European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP/EPUAP). Prevention and treat- ment of pressure ulcers treatment : Clinical practice guide. Wash-ington, DC. National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel. 2009 : 1-15.
  • 8National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel. Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH) PUSH Tool Version 3.0:1998 ( 1998-9-15 ) [ EB/OL ] [ 2012-1-3 ]. http://www, nupap, org/pressure ulcer scale for healing.
  • 9Wound Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society (WOCNS). Guideline for Prevention and Management of Pressure Ulcers. Copyright by the Wound Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society. 15000 Commerce Parkway, Suite C, Mount Laurel 2010:5-20.
  • 10Regan MA, Teasell RW, Wo{fe DL, et al. A systematic rev~.ew of therapeutic interventions for pressure ulcers after spinal cord injury[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2009, 90(2) : 213-231.

共引文献388

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部