期刊文献+

基于COOC平台的“医学信息分析”混合式教学满意度及影响因素研究 被引量:2

Study on Satisfactions of Blended Learning of Medical Information Analysis and its Factors Based on COOC Platform
下载PDF
导出
摘要 研究对“医学信息分析”课程开展混合式教学,分析学生对教学的满意度及其影响因素。通过问卷调查,采用Logistic回归分析满意度影响因素。调查结果显示学生对混合式教学满意度评价中位数和四分位数为4.39(4.00,4.92)分;研究对象对混合式教学带来的学习收获(58.5%)、师生互动(68.3%)和生生互动(68.3%)表示很满意。Logistic回归显示教师对COOC平台的熟悉程度显著影响教学满意度,熟悉程度越低,学生对教学的满意度越低,OR(95%CI):0.071(0.006,0.851)。学生对“医学信息分析”混合式教学的满意度较高;教师对网络学习平台的应用能力显著影响教学满意度。 To analyze satisfaction from students’perception,and study the influencing factors of satisfaction on blended learning for the Medical Information Analysis based on the COOC platform and Rain Classroom.Questionnaire was used to collect data,and Logistic regression model was used to analyse the factors of satisfactory.The results showed that degree of students’satisfaction was high,and the median(quartile)of satisfaction scores of 26 investigated items was 4.39(4.00,4.92).The multivariate logistic regression model showed that teachers’familiarity of COOC was positive influencing students’satisfaction on blended learning,OR(95%CI):0.071(0.006,0.851).Students have a high degree of satisfaction with blended learning,and teachers’online teaching technology capabilities will help to improve the satisfaction of blended learning.
作者 吕亚兰 浦科学 刘家秀 LYU Ya-lan;PU Ke-xue;LIU Jia-xiu(School of Medical Informatics,Chongqing Medical University,Chongqing 400016,China)
出处 《教育教学论坛》 2024年第1期13-16,共4页 Education And Teaching Forum
基金 2021年度重庆市高等教育教学改革研究项目“学习分析视域下的混合式教学模式设计及效果评价”(213119) 2020年度重庆医科大学教育教学研究项目“医学生信息素养教育课程混合式教学模式研究与实践”(JY200312) 2019年度重庆医科大学医学信息学院教学改革研究项目“基于COOC平台的混合式教学模式研究与实践——以‘医学信息分析’课程为例”(2019B003)。
关键词 COOC平台 混合式教学 满意度 影响因素 COOC platform blended learning satisfaction factors
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献31

  • 1鲁茂,贺昌政.对多重共线性问题的探讨[J].统计与决策,2007,23(8):6-9. 被引量:27
  • 2Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: definition, current trends, and future directions. In Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs,edited by C. J. Bonk and C. R. Graham, pp. 3-21. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing.
  • 3Young, J. R. (2002). "Hybrid" teaching seeks to end the divide between traditional and online instruction. Chron. High. Educ.,March 22, A-33.
  • 4Finn, A. (2002). Trends in e-learning.Learning Circuits , 3 (http:// www.learningcircuits.org/2002/ nov2002/finn.htm).
  • 5Michael Zastrocky, Marti Harris, Jan-Martin Lowendahi (2008). Elearning for Higher Education: Are We Reaching Maturity? Industry Research, ID Number: G 00156361, 27 March 2008.
  • 6Tom Browne, Roger Hewitt, Martin Jenkins and Richard Walker (2008), 2008 survey of technology enhanced learning for higher education in UK, Universities and colleges Information systems Association.
  • 7李海霞.韩国高等教育信息化发展近况及其启示[M].新华教育观察高等教育版,2009.
  • 8Mohammad Iqbal Bashar & Habibullah Khan (2007). E-Learning in Singapore: A Brief Assessment, U21Global Working Paper, No. 003/ 2007.
  • 9北京大学信息化建设与管理办公室.北京大学信息化建设规划及实施方案(2006-2015)年.北京大学,2005.
  • 10Prensky, M. (2001b). Digital natives, digital immigrants. Part 2. Do they really think differently? On Horizon, 9(6),1-6.

共引文献244

同被引文献23

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部