期刊文献+

博士生教育分流退出制度优化策略 被引量:2

The Optimization Strategies of the Diversion-Withdrawal System of Doctoral Education
下载PDF
导出
摘要 “分流退出制度”作为一项复杂、系统而又影响广泛的博士生教育重要制度构成,直接影响并作用于博士生教育的质量、水平和声誉。根据“史密斯模型”的分析框架发现,我国博士生教育“分流退出制度”存在政策文件的内容表述与操作规范“模糊”、实施高校的规章立制与执行落实“走形”、博士生和导师的价值认知与责任意识“匮乏”、社会认识与公共理念的支持氛围“缺失”等现实问题。博士生教育分流退出制度的政策执行与制度落实,受制于政策内容供给碎片化、相关责任主体难协调、政策落实理念难整合、政策执行方式不适配等多因素的综合影响。必须优化政策制度的科学设计,强化分流退出制度的操作执行;改善实施院校的落实执行,建立健全分流退出制度的运行机制;提高师生主体的理念认识,增强对分流退出制度的认可参与;加强向社会环境的理念宣传,塑造分流退出制度的适应生态,等等,以此改进并完善博士生教育“分流退出制度”的规范落实与全面推广。 As a complex,systematic and widely influential system of doctoral education,the“diversion-withdrawal system”directly affects the quality,level and reputation of doctoral education.According to the analysis framework of Smith Model,it is found that there are some practical problems in the“diversion-withdrawal system”of doctoral education in China,such as“vague content expression and operational norms”,“out of shape”in implementing the rules and regulations of colleges and universities,“lack of value cognition and responsibility consciousness”of doctoral students and tutors,and“lack of supporting atmosphere for social understanding and public ideas”.In-depth analysis shows that the policy implementation and system implementation of the doctoral education diversion-withdrawal system are subject to the comprehensive influence of many factors,such as fragmentation of policy content supply,difficulty in coordinating relevant responsible subjects,and in integrating policy implementation concepts,and inappropriate policy implementation methods.In view of mizing the scientific design of the policy system, to improve the implementation of colleges and universities, toestablish and improve the operating mechanism of the diversion-withdrawal system, to improve the conceptualunderstanding of teachers and students, and enhance the recognition and participation in the diversion-withdrawal system, and to strengthen the concept propaganda to the social environment and shape the adaptive ecology of the diversion-withdrawal system, in order to improve and perfect the standardized implementation andcomprehensive promotion of the“diversion-withdrawal system”of doctoral education.
作者 陈林 CHEN Lin
出处 《高教发展与评估》 北大核心 2024年第1期96-108,118,I0006,I0007,共16页 Higher Education Development and Evaluation
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究规划项目“研究生教育评估制度研究”(18YJA880123)。
关键词 博士生教育 分流退出制度 研究生培养 教育政策 doctoral education diversion-withdrawal system graduate education education policy
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

二级参考文献128

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部