期刊文献+

ChatGPT机器回答与知乎人工回答的比较 被引量:7

A Comparative Study on the Response Characteristics of ChatGPT and Zhihu
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章对从网络问答社区代表知乎和ChatGPT上同一提问获得的人工高赞答案和机器回答开展内容分析,基于外部特征、内部特征、情感与认知等探讨机器回答相对于人工问答的优劣。研究发现:ChatGPT能使人更便捷地获得信息,回答特征接近人工认可的高赞回答,但针对不同主题的回答质量存在差异,也存在虚假信息;以ChatGPT为代表的结合人工智能技术生成内容驱动的工具将广泛应用于人类活动,但需要防范信息误导、认知对抗、文明失控等风险。 This article conducts a content analysis of human and machine responses to the same question from the online Q&A communities Zhihu and ChatGPT,and explores the advantages and disadvantages of machine responses over human responses based on external features,internal features,emotions,and cognition.The study suggests that:ChatGPT allows people to have a easier access to information,with response characteristics close to human-approved,highly liked answers,but there are differences in the quality of responses provided by ChatGPT for different topics,as well as disinformation.In the future,ChatGPT-like tools driven by AI-generated content(AlGC),will be widely used in human activities,but risks such as misinformation,cognitive confrontation and loss of civility need to be guarded against.
作者 施亦龙 许鑫 SHI Yilong;XU Xin
出处 《图书馆论坛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2024年第1期151-159,共9页 Library Tribune
关键词 ChatGPT 知乎 UGC社会化问答社区 内容特征比较 ChatGPT Zhihu UGC-based social Q&A community comparison of content characteristics
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献67

  • 1叶鹰.智能信息分析的理论基础与技术模型[J].情报学报,2005,24(2):233-236. 被引量:16
  • 2Blooma, M.J., Chua, A. Y., & Goh, D.H. (2008). A predictive framework for retrieving the best answer. Proceeding 2008 ACM Symposium Applied Computing, ACM Press, 1107-1111.
  • 3Blooma, M.J., Chua, A. Y., & Goh, D.H. (2011). What makes a high-quality user- generated answer? lnternet Computing, 15(1), 66-71.
  • 4Bodendorf, F., & Kaiser, C. (2009). Detecting opinion leaders and trends in online social networks. Paper presented at the 2nd ACM Workshop on Social Web Search and Mining, Hong Kong.
  • 5Burrell, N. A., & Koper, R. J. (1998). The efficacy of powerful/powerless language on attitudes and source credibility. In M. Allen & R. W. Preiss (Eds.), Persuasion: advances through meta-analysis (pp. 203-216). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
  • 6Burt, R. S. (1999). The social capital of opinion leaders. Annuals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 566(1 ), 37-54.
  • 7Butler, B. S. (2001). Membership size, communication activity, and sustainability: a resource-based model of online social structures. Information Systems Research, 12, 346-362.
  • 8Flanagin, A. (2007). Commercial markets as communication markets: uncertainty reduction through mediated information exchange in online auctions. New Media & Society, 9, 401.
  • 9Hollander, E. E (1961). Emergent leadership and social influence. In L. Petrullo & B. M. Bass (Eds.), Leadership and interpersonal behavior (pp. 30-47). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  • 10Huffaker, D. (2010). Dimensions of leadership and social influence in online communities. Human Communicadon Research, 36, 593-617.

共引文献516

同被引文献120

引证文献7

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部