穿刺Gleason评分6~7分前列腺癌根治术后ISUP升级预测模型的建立与内部验证

Establishment and internal validation of nomogram for prediction of ISUP upgrading of prostate biopsy Gleason score 6 or 7

目的:穿刺Gleason评分6~7分的前列腺癌患者术后易发生国际泌尿病理学会(International Society of Urological Pathology, ISUP)升级。因此,本研究通过临床指标构建一个预测ISUP分级升级的列线图模型并进行内部验证。方法:回顾性收集我院2019年1月—2021年12月因前列腺癌行手术治疗的患者临床病理资料。根据术后ISUP分级是否升级将纳入患者分为升级组和未升级组,Student t检验及χ^(2)检验比较2组患者的临床指标,桑基图显示穿刺与术后ISUP的变化程度。通过logistic回归分析明确与ISUP升级相关的临床指标,构建术后ISUP升级的预测模型,受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线和曲线下面积用于评估模型的预测能力,校准曲线和决策曲线用于分析评估模型的准确性和临床有效性。结果:本研究共纳入155例患者。升级组和未升级组分别为79例和76例,升级比例为51.0%。在穿刺Gleason评分3+3、3+4、4+3分中,ISUP升级的比例分别为68.8%、47.1%和25.0%。预测列线图模型由体重指数(BMI)、穿刺前PSA水平、穿刺Gleason评分及临床T分期4个指标组成。ROC曲线结果显示预测模型的准确性高达0.799,校准曲线和决策曲线均提示预测模型具有一致性以及较好的临床获益。结论:由BMI、穿刺前PSA水平、穿刺Gleason评分及临床T分期4个指标构建的预测ISUP升级的列线图模型准确性相对较高,该模型有助于临床医师进行术前评估及为患者咨询提供个体化信息。

Objective Gleason score 6 or 7 of biopsy pathology tend to upgrade after radical surgery.So this study aimed to develop and internally validate a nomogram to predict ISUP upgrading.Methods Clinicopathological information of prostate cancer patients,who underwent radical prostatectomy between January 2019 and December 2021 in our hospital were collected retrospectively.Patients were divided into two groups according to ISUP upgrading.Student t test and Chi-square test were applied to compare clinical parameters and Sankey diagram to describe ISUP group change.A predictive nomogram,which was constructed on the basis of four clinical indicators,was evaluated by receiver operation characteristic(ROC)curve and the area under the curve,furthermore,calibration curve and decision curve analysis were performed to evaluate the accuracy and efficiency of the nomogram.Results Totally 155 patients were enrolled and the groups with and without ISUP upgrading were 79 and 76 patients,respectively.The overall proportion of upgrading was 51.0%,and the corresponding proportion of biopsy Gleason score 3+3,3+4 and 4+3 were 68.8%,47.1%and 25.0%,respectively.The predictive nomogram was based on BMI,pre-biopsy PSA value,biopsy Gleason score and clinical T stage.The accuracy of nomogram was 0.799 and calibration curve and decision curve analysis proved the robustness and satisfactory clinical benefit of predictive model.Conclusion Our study proposed a predictive nomogram for ISUP upgrading with relatively high accuracy and the nomogram was helpful for preoperative evaluation and individualized consultation.