帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪定性之探讨

Discussion on the crime characterization of assisting information network crime activities

现有帮信罪定性观点均以共犯理论为依托,但无论正犯说、共犯说抑或并合说,均无法对司法解释中通常属于共犯、例外属于正犯的双重属性界定予以兼顾,因此唯有摆脱共犯理论方能实现帮信罪的准确定性。误用共犯理论的原因在于帮信罪共犯型的犯罪构成,而为帮信罪赋予独立的犯罪构成资格即可在理论纠偏的同时实现其准确定性。“他人利用信息网络实施犯罪”作为帮信罪条文中共犯特征的标志性表述,为其给予独立的构成要件要素定位即可赋予帮信罪独立的犯罪构成资格,且“他人利用信息网络实施犯罪”只得视为帮信罪客观情状。由此,帮信罪得以实现当然的正犯定性。

The existing qualitative views of the crime of aiding and abetting are all based on the theory of accomplice,but no matter the principal theory,accomplice theory or the combination theory,they cannot give consideration to the dual attribute definition of the crime of aiding and abetting in judicial interpretation.Only by getting rid of the theory of accomplice can we achieve accurate characterization of the crime of aiding and abetting.The reason of misusing the theory of accomplice lies in the constitution of the crime of accomplice,and giving independent qualification of the constitution of the crime of accomplice can realize its accurate characterization while correcting the theory.“Others use information network crime”is the symbolic expression of the characteristics of the co-offender in the provisions of the crime of helping the trust,and giving it independent constituent elements of the crime can give the crime of helping the trust independent qualification of the crime,and“others use information network crime”can only be regarded as the objective circumstances of the crime of helping the trust.The crime of helping trust can then realize the nature of principal offender according to its independent crime constitution.