期刊文献+

后疫情时代新冠疫苗知识产权豁免制度评析

A Review of COVID-19 Vaccine TRIPS Waiver Mechanism in the Post-Pandemic Era
原文传递
导出
摘要 自新冠疫情暴发以来,全球疫苗获取呈现两极分化,印度和南非于2020年10月向TRIPS理事会提交新冠疫苗知识产权豁免提案。豁免提案经过一年半多的谈判,WTO第十二届部长级会议最终达成新冠疫苗知识产权豁免决议。全球进入后疫情时代,疫苗获取仍然是应对新冠大流行的关键。本文主要关注新冠疫苗知识产权豁免机制的内容及意义,从论证新冠疫苗知识产权豁免决议的正当性开始,回顾新冠疫苗知识产权豁免决议的谈判历程,追踪新冠疫苗知识产权豁免决议的文本来源,并评估和反思新冠疫苗知识产权豁免决议的价值。尽管豁免决议不够完善,但就目前而言,灵活运用强制许可制度是一个能够达成的具有最大程度灵活性的方案。因此,新冠疫苗知识产权豁免决议是值得欢迎和期待的。 Global access to vaccines has been polarized since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic.India and South Africa submitted a request for TRIPS waiver of COVID-19 to the TRIPS Council in October 2020.After more than a year and a half of negotiations on theTRIPSS waiver proposal,the 12th WTO Ministerial Conference finally reached a resolution on the COVID--19 vaccines TRIPS waiver.As the world enters the post-pandemic era,access to vaccines remains key to the response to a new crown pandemic.The article focuses on the content and significance of the COVID-19 Vaccine TRIPS waiver mechanism.It starts with the justification of the COVID-19 Vaccine TRIPS waiver resolution,reviews the negotiation process of the COVID-19 Vaccine TRIPS waiver resolution and analyzes the text source of the COVID-19 Vaccine TRIPS waiver resolution,and assesses and reflects on the value of the COVID-19 Vaccine TRIPS waiver resolution.This paper argues that although the COVID-19 Vaccine TRIPS waiver resolution is not perfect,for the time being,the flexible application of the compulsory licensing system was the most flexible solution that could be achieved,and it is still welcome and expected.
作者 徐丽娟 XU Lijuan
机构地区 武汉大学
出处 《中国国际法年刊》 2022年第1期175-199,共25页 Chinese Yearbook Of International Law
基金 国家社科基金重大项目“重大突发公共卫生事件的国际法问题研究”(20&ZD201) 国家社会科学基金一般项目“后TRIPS时代知识产权全球治理体系变革与中国因应方略研究”(18BFX157)支持。
关键词 新冠大流行 新冠疫苗知识产权豁免决议 强制许可 后疫情时代 COVID-19 Pandemic COVID-19 Vaccine TRIPS Waiver Resolution compulsory license post-pandemic Era
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献9

  • 1朱颖.美国知识产权保护制度的发展——以自由贸易协定为拓展知识产权保护的手段[J].知识产权,2006,16(5):87-91. 被引量:15
  • 2Peter M. Gerhart , The Triangulation of International Intellectual Property Law: Cooperation, Power and Normative Welfare. 36 Case W. Res. J. Int'l L. 1,2004,3-6.
  • 3Laurence R.Helfer , Regime Shifting: The TRIPs Agreement and New Dynamics of International Intellectual Property Lawmaking, 29 Yale J. Int'l L. 10-15.
  • 4Bipartisan Trade Promotion Authority Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. I07-210, § 2102(b)(4)(A)(i)(II), 116 Stat. 993, 996 (codified at 19 U. S.C. § 3802(b) (4) (A) (i) (II) (2006)).
  • 5Guide to GATT Law and Proctice on CD-ROM,Analytical Index,Copyright 1997,World Trade Organization(WTO)and Vista Intermedia Corporation.,p.882,885,886,886-887,884,888,888-889.
  • 6John H.Jackson:1995 Docurments Supplement to Legal Problems of International Economic Relations,Third Edition,West Publishing Co.,1995,P.50 and p.8
  • 7张宇燕,高程.精英主导、集团政治与美国行为[J].国际经济评论,2007(6):12-17. 被引量:10
  • 8.India’’s Generics-Big Pharma Battle Drops Drug Prices,Raises Legal Debate[]..2012
  • 9http://www.pharmalot.com/.../bayer-loses-nexavar-compulsory-license-battle/。 .

共引文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部