期刊文献+

利益相关者理论视角下医学特色智库建设路径

Study on the Construction Path of Medical Characteristic Think Tanks From the Perspective of Stakeholder Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 中国特色新型智库是国家软实力的重要组成部分,是构建国家现代治理体系和提高现代治理能力的重要抓手。医学特色智库作为建设具有中国特色新型智库的生动实践,对医学健康事业的发展具有显著推动作用。文章根据我国医学特色智库建设现状,应用利益相关者理论,将医学特色智库建设的各相关主体分为三类,即核心利益相关者、重要利益相关者和一般利益相关者。进而构建各利益相关主体对医学特色智库的运行作用机制模型,从高校、医院、医疗科研机构、政府、企业以及社会大众等不同层面,提出了医学特色智库建设的路径选择。 The new type of think tank with Chinese characteristics is a vital component of national soft power,as well as an important lever for building a modern governance system and enhancing modern governance capabilities.As a vivid practice in this respect,medical characteristic think tanks play a significant role in accelerating the advancement of medical and health care undertakings.According to stakeholder theory,the article categorizes the various stakeholders involved into three categories,namely,core,important and general stakeholders.Furthermore,a model for the operation of medical characteristic think tanks by various stakeholders was constructed,and path choices were proposed from different perspectives such as universities,hospitals,medical research institutions,government,enterprises and the general public.
作者 杨婷婷 任兆舟 Yang Tingting;Ren Zhaozhou(Clinical Skills Practice Teaching Center of China Medical University,Shenyang 110122;Shengjing Hospital Affiliated to China Medical University,Shenyang 110122)
出处 《中阿科技论坛(中英文)》 2024年第2期47-51,共5页 China-Arab States Science and Technology Forum
关键词 医学特色智库 利益相关者理论 建设路径 健康中国 Medical characteristic think tanks Stakeholder theory Construction path Healthy China
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献35

  • 1薛澜,朱旭峰.“中国思想库”:涵义、分类与研究展望[J].科学学研究,2006,24(3):321-327. 被引量:140
  • 2巩艳芳,巩艳梅.美国思想库及其影响[J].广西社会科学,2006(12):155-158. 被引量:8
  • 3朱旭峰.国际思想库网络——基于“二轨国际机制”模型的理论建构与实证研究[J].世界经济与政治,2007(5):22-29. 被引量:10
  • 4Global Go To Think Tanks 2010, http://www.fpri. org/research/thinktanks/GlobalGoToThinkTanks2010, pdf.(上网时间:2011年10月1日).
  • 5James Smith, Idea Brokers: Think Tanks and the Rise of the New Policy Elite, New York: The Free Press, 1991.
  • 6Donald Abelson, Do Think Tanks Matter? Assessing the Impact of Public Policy Institute, McGILL-Queen' s University Press, 2002.
  • 7James McGann, Comparative Think Tanks, Politics and Public Policy, Edward Elgar, 2005.
  • 8James McGann, Think Tanks and Policy Advice in the U. S: Academics, Advisors and Advocates, Routledge, 2007.
  • 9Michael Bark, Independent Think Tanks and Patronage: Interest Representation in the Policy Process, Ph. D Dissertation, Kansas University, 1996.
  • 10Joseph Montville, "The Arrow and the Olive Branch: A Case for Track Two Diplomacy", in John W. MacDonald, Jr. , and Diane B. Bendahmane, eds. , Conflict Resolution: Track Two Diplomacy, Washington, D. C. : Foreign Service Institute, 1987, pp.5-20.

共引文献64

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部