期刊文献+

科学思维:内涵、要素与方法 被引量:2

Scientific Thinking:Connotation,Elements and Methods
原文传递
导出
摘要 从思维的内涵及基本要素出发,分析了科学思维的基石——逻辑体系和证据,阐述了科学思维的客观性、合理性、可验证性、系统性、准确性等特征;探讨了比较、分类、类比、分析、综合、归纳、演绎等科学思维方法的内涵及其运用时的注意事项;分析了杰出科学家的成功机制及思维与品质特征,特别强调了21世纪的科学家应该具备的思维及品质特征及其对科学教育的启示。 From the connotation and basic elements of thinking,this paper analyzed the cor-nerstone of scientific thinking:logical system and evidence,and elaborated on the characteristics of objectivity,rationality,verifiability,systematicity,and accuracy of scientific thinking;Ex-plored the connotations of scientific thinking methods such as comparison,classification,analo-gy,analysis,synthesis,induction,deduction,and the precautions for their application;Ana-lyzed the successful mechanisms and thinking quality characteristics of outstanding scientists,with special emphasis on the thinking quality characteristics that scientists in the 2lst century should possess and their implications for science education.
作者 朱玉军 王香凤 ZHU Yu-Jun;WANG Xiang-Feng(College of Chemistry,Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875,China;Analysis and Test Center,Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875,China)
出处 《化学教育(中英文)》 CAS 北大核心 2024年第1期9-14,共6页 Chinese Journal of Chemical Education
关键词 科学思维 科学课程标准 逻辑定律 思维要素 科学教育 科学家品质 scientific thinking science curriculum standards logic law thinking elements science education scientist quality
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献35

  • 1萨顿.科学的生命[M].北京:商务印书馆,1987.152.
  • 2默顿.十七世纪英国的科学、技术与社会[M].成都:四川人民出版社,1986,9..
  • 3袁翰青 应礼文.化学重要史实[M].北京:人民教育出版社,1989..
  • 4[1]Gardner Lindzey. et al, Psychology. 2/e. New York :Worth Publishers. 1978. PP. 309-318.
  • 5[2]Richard Paul. ‘Critical Thinking: Basic Questions and Answers ' http ://www. sonoma.edu/cthink/
  • 6[3]Richard Paul. ‘Why student and Teachers Don't Reason Well ' http://www. sonoma. edu/cthink/
  • 7[4]David Hitchcock. ‘Do the Fallacies Have a Place in the Teaching of Reasoning Skills or critical Thinking?' in Fallacies:Classical and contemporary rdadings. Hanson and Robert CPinto. eds.University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press. 1995. pp. 320-321.
  • 8[5]Joel Rudinow. Invitation to critical thinking. 4/e.Orlando :Vincent Ebarry Harcourt Brace CollegePublishers. 1999. pp. 6-9.
  • 9[6]J. Anthony Blair. 'The Place of Teaching Informal Fallacies in Teaching Reasoning Skills or Critical Thinking'. in Fallacies: Classcal and contemporary rdadings. Hans V. Hanson and Robert C. Pinto. eds. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press. 1995. pp. 328-330.
  • 10[7]Richard Paul and Linda Elder. 'Helping Students Assess Their Thinking'. http://www. sonoma. edu/cthink/

共引文献279

同被引文献17

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部