期刊文献+

不同构型电动垂直起降飞行器动力系统的安全性评估 被引量:1

Safety evaluation of the power system of electric vertical take-off and landing vehicles with different configurations
下载PDF
导出
摘要 安全性评估对电动垂直起降飞行器的架构开发、安全管理、设计验证及商业化有着至关重要的作用,但目前国内少有对电动垂直起降飞行器整机构型、系统设计等相关的研究。本文针对4种不同构型的电动垂直起降飞行器,包括垂起尾推固定翼构型、四轴八桨多旋翼构型、固定翼加倾转旋翼构型以及倾转机翼构型,使用功能危害分析和故障树分析方法对4种不同构型的动力系统进行了分析比较。分析表明:垂起尾推固定翼电动垂直起降飞行器动力架构在本文的特定使用场景中相对可靠性更优。2种分析方法的结合,增加了对功能危害理解的全面性和深度,并识别了减轻动力系统失效风险的多种潜在途径。安全性评估结果可以为电动垂直起降飞行器动力构型选择和产品开发提供依据。 Safety evaluation is critical in the architecture development,safety management,design verification,and commercialization of electric vertical take-off and landing(eVTOL)aircrafts.However,relevant research on eVTOL configuration and system design in China is limited.In this study,four different configurations of eVTOL aircraft,including lift and cruise fixed-wing aircraft,multi-rotor aircraft with four axes and eight rotors,fixed-wing and tilt-rotor aircraft,and tilt-wing aircraft,were analyzed and compared using functional hazard analysis(FHA)and fault tree analysis(FTA)methods.The analysis results show that the power configuration of lift and cruise fixed-wing eVTOL aircraft has better reliability than the three other configurations in the specific application scenar-ios considered in this study.The combination of the FHA and FTA methods adds comprehensiveness and depth to the understanding of functional hazards and identifies multiple potential pathways to mitigate the risk of power sys-tem failure.The safety evaluation results can be used as a reference for eVTOL dynamic configuration selection and product development.
作者 刘巨江 谭郁松 LIU Jujiang;TAN Yusong(College of Computer,National University of Defense Technology,Changsha 410073,China;Automotive Engineering Research Institute,Guangzhou Automobile Group Co.,Ltd,Guangzhou 511434,China)
出处 《哈尔滨工程大学学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2024年第2期339-348,共10页 Journal of Harbin Engineering University
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(U19A2060)。
关键词 电动垂直起降 动力架构 安全性评估 电动飞行器 功能危害分析 故障树分析 失效风险 整机构型 electric vertical take-off and landing powertrain configuration safety evaluation electric aircraft functional hazard analyses fault tree analysis failure risk aircraft configuration
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献65

  • 1刘斌,马晓平,王和平,周康生.小型电动无人机总体参数设计方法研究[J].西北工业大学学报,2005,23(3):396-400. 被引量:31
  • 2杨祯梅,孙安宏.对民用飞机整机级安全性评估依据和方法的探讨[A].第二届中国航空维修工程学术研讨会论文集[C],2005:72-76.
  • 3韩小琦.航空发动机控制系统安全性评估研究[D].天津:中国民航大学,2008.
  • 4MIL-STD-882E, Draft Standard Practice for System Safety[S]. 2005.
  • 5Rudolph Frederick Stapelberg. Handbook of Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety in Engineering Design[M]. London: Springer,2009:89 - 114.
  • 6Acar, Erdem. Aircraft Structural Safety: Effects of Explicit and Implicit Safety Measures and Uncertainty Reduction Mechanisms[D]. Florida: University of Florida, 2006.
  • 7Sloan, John C. Finite Safety Models for High-assurance Systems[ D]. Florida: Atlantic University, 2010.
  • 8Krishna B. Misra. Handbook of Performability Engineering[M]. London: British Library, 2008:56 -63.
  • 9XU Ling-ling, CHUN Xiao, DU Hui-bin. Building fire protection system reliability analysis based on GO method[A]. 2010 IEEE the 17th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management [C], 2010 : 1 019 - 1 022.
  • 10ZHENG Wei. Modeling and hazard analysis of railway station protection system based on stochastic petri nets[A]. The Proceedings of 2009 8^th International Conference on Reliability, Maintainability and Safety[C], 2009:493 -496.

共引文献136

同被引文献2

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部