期刊文献+

考虑车型差异影响的乘用车车身生命周期评价

Life cycle assessment of passenger car body considering vehicle model variations
原文传递
导出
摘要 尽管汽车轻量化能够有效降低使用阶段的环境影响,但在全生命周期包括原材料获取、制造及装配、运输、运行使用以及回收的考虑下,轻量化并不一定能达到节能减排的效果.针对此问题,本文建立了包含乘用车各个阶段生命周期评价模型,在考虑车型差异的基础上,采集奇瑞公司的4款微型车及市面上销量较大的4款紧凑型和4款中大型车车身,分别进行了生命周期评价,分析其化石能源消耗、矿产资源消耗及环境排放.清单分析结果表明:①在当前我国电力结构下,铝制车身在全生命周期内具有较大的优势,主要体现在制造装配及运行使用阶段,而钢制车身在原材料获取阶段表现出较低的能耗和环境排放;②对于采用不同的动力系统的车身而言,在设定的功能单位行驶里程内,纯电动汽车仅在化石能源消耗方面优于内燃机汽车.在上述结果的基础上,重点讨论了在未来电力结构的变化、行驶里程增加及回收处理过程优化的3种情境下12种车身的环境影响变化,铝制车身和电动汽车在环境影响方面的优势会更加凸显.本研究有助于为我国汽车生产企业及其上下游产业链条面向碳中和的产品绿色设计及碳足迹降低提供借鉴. It is well known that lightweight vehicles can effectively reduce the environmental impact in the use phase,but they may not achieve energy saving and emission reduction under the consideration of the whole life cycle.To address this issue,this paper established a life cycle assessment model for passenger cars,and the fossil energy consumption,mineral resource consumption,and environmental emissions were analyzed.The phases of raw material acquisition,manufacturing and assembly,transportation,use,and recycling were considered in a whole life cycle.The assessment selected and compared four micro cars from Chery Company,four compact,and four medium-large cars with large market shares.Results of inventory analysis show that:①Under the current power structure in China,the aluminum body has a significant advantage in the whole life cycle,while the steel body has lower energy consumption and environmental emissions in the raw material acquisition stage.②For car bodies with different power systems,electric vehicles only have an advantage over fuel vehicles in terms of fossil energy consumption within the set functional unit mileage.Moreover,the environmental impact changes of the abovementioned 12 types of bodies under three scenarios of future power structure change,mileage increase and recycling process optimization were discussed.The advantages of aluminum bodies and electric vehicles in terms of environmental impacts will become more prominent.This study assists in providing a reference for green design and carbon footprint reduction for China's automobile manufacturers.
作者 李新宇 廖煜民 张元昊 余光海 LI Xinyu;LIAO Yumin;ZHANG Yuanhao;YU Guanghai(School of Mechanical Engineering,Hefei University of Technology,Hefei 230009;Intelligent Manufacturing Institute of HFUT,Hefei University of Technology,Hefei 230009;Key Laboratory of Green Design and Manufacturing of Mechanical Industry,Hefei University of Technology,Hefei 230009)
出处 《环境科学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2024年第1期462-476,共15页 Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae
基金 国家重点研发项目(No.2019YFC1908002) 工信部重点装备制造行业碳达峰、碳中和公共服务平台项目(No.2021-H028-1-1)。
关键词 生命周期评价 车身 轻量化 节能减排 环境影响 life cycle assessment bodywork lightweight energy saving and emission reduction environmental impact
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献49

  • 1宋瑞敏,张波.火电厂二氧化硫排放量的测算方法研究[J].内蒙古石油化工,2011,37(2):55-57. 被引量:4
  • 2王寿兵,董辉,王如松,杨建新,吴千红.中国某轿车生命周期内能耗和环境排放特性[J].复旦学报(自然科学版),2006,45(3):328-334. 被引量:21
  • 3中华人民共和国国家统计局.中华人民共和国2010年国民经济和社会发展统计公报[EB/OL].www.stats.gov.cn.2011-02-28.
  • 4李东光,朱萍萍,范雨听,等.废旧金属、电池、催化剂回收利用实例[M].北京:中国电力出版社,2010:205-206.
  • 5Gu S Y. 2010. Life cycle assessment on autoliv's electronic control unit[D]. Goteborg, Sweden : Chalmers University of Technology.
  • 6Guin6e J B, Gorr^e M , Heijungs R,ei al. 2001. Life cycle assessment: Anoperational guide to the ISO standards [ M]. Den Haag and Leiden,The Netherlands: Spatial Planning and Environment ( VROM ) andCentre of Environmental Science( CML).
  • 7Jamie A, Trevor P. 2007. Life-cycle assessment of diesel, natural gas andhydrogen fuel cell bus transportation systems [ J ] . Journal of PowerSources, 170(2) :401-411.
  • 8Mats Z, Lars A , Jessica 0. 2010. Life cycle assessment of lithium-ionbatteries for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles- Critical issues [ J ]Journal of Cleaner Production, 18: 1519-1529.
  • 9Michael H , Michael B. 2011. Assessment of the environmental impactsof electric vehicle concepts [ J ]. Towards Life Cycle SustainabilityManagement, (9) : 535-546.
  • 10Rajive D, Jonathan G 0,Gary A D. 1999. Life-cycle environmentalevaluation of aluminum and composite intensive vehicles [ R ],Knoxville: University of Tennessee, Center for Clean Products andClean Technologies.

共引文献53

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部