摘要
合法性审查、适当性审查是行政复议机关审查被申请行政行为的两个审查标准。适当性审查与行政诉讼合理性审查表述不同但内容一致。合法性审查是形式合法性审查,适当性审查是实质合法性审查,因此,适当性审查与合法性审查构成了一种从“从形式违法到实质违法”的双阶审查方法。在形式合法性已经确认的前提下,针对被申请行政行为的内容,行政复议机关可以从合目的性、结果可接受性和利益权衡三个面向作适当性审查。
Legitimacy review and appropriateness review are the two review criteria for the administrative review authority to review the applied administrative action.Appropriateness review and reasonableness review in administrative litigation have different expressions but consistent content.Legitimacy review is a formal legality review,while appropriateness review is a substantive legality review.Therefore,appropriateness review is a two-stage review method that goes from formal legality.On the premise that the formal legality has been confirmed,the administrative reconsideration authority may conduct an appropriate review of the substantive legality of the applied administrative act.
作者
章剑生
Zhang Jiansheng(Guanghua Law School,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310008)
出处
《浙江社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2024年第2期30-41,156,共13页
Zhejiang Social Sciences
关键词
行政复议
适当性审查
合法性审查
利益权衡
administrative reconsideration
examination of reasonableness
legitimacy review
balancing interests