优化T-SPOT.TB在区分脊柱结核与其他脊柱感染中的诊断效能

Diagnostic efficacy of optimized T-SPOT.TB in differentiating spinal tuberculosis from other spinal infection

目的 探讨结核感染T细胞斑点试验(T-SPOT.TB)在脊柱结核(STB)鉴别诊断中的效能,并通过受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线最佳截断值优化诊断效能。方法 收集2010年1月—2019年5月某院脊柱感染患者的临床资料,包括术前T-SPOT.TB检测结果、白细胞计数、C-反应蛋白、血沉、降钙素原和结核抗体等相关数据,根据诊断标准进行临床诊断,分析T-SPOT.TB在术前诊断STB与其他脊柱感染中的灵敏度和特异度,评价优化后的T-SPOT.TB指标的诊断效能。结果 共纳入132例患者,其中78例(59.09%)为STB,54例(40.91%)为非结核脊柱感染。T-SPOT.TB在鉴别诊断STB方面的灵敏度为67.68%,特异度为66.67%。单因素logistic回归分析显示,与非结核脊柱感染比较,T-SPOT.TB检测诊断STB的OR值为4.188(95%CI:1.847~9.974,P<0.001)。优化T-SPOT.TB评价指标,通过绘制ROC曲线,确定ESAT-6、CFP-10、CFP-10+ESAT-6在STB和非结核脊柱感染鉴别诊断中的最佳截断值,分别为12.5、19.5、36,曲线下面积(AUC)分别是0.765 6、0.741 5、0.778 6,均具有较好的诊断性能,其中以CFP-10+ESAT-6的AUC最高。CFP-10+ESAT-6特异性斑点数在脊柱结核诊断中性能更佳,其诊断准确度为75.56%,较优化前T-SPOT.TB的67.42%高。结论 T-SPOT.TB检测在区分STB与非结核脊柱感染方面显示出较高的诊断效能,T-SPOT.TB检测呈阳性,尤其是当CFP-10+ESAT-6的斑点数超过36时,提示脊柱结核的可能性较大。

Objective To explore the efficacy of T-cell spot test of tuberculosis infection(T-SPOT.TB)in the differential diagnosis of spinal tuberculosis(STB),and optimize diagnostic efficacy through the optimal cut-off value of receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve.Methods Clinical data of patients with spinal infection in a hospital from January 2010 to May 2019 were collected,including preoperative T-SPOT.TB test results,white blood cell count,C-reactive protein,erythrocyte sedimentation rate,procalcitonin,and tuberculosis antibodies,et al.Clinical diagnosis was conducted based on diagnostic criteria.The sensitivity and specificity of T-SPOT.TB in preoperative diagnosis of STB and other spinal infection was analyzed,and the diagnostic efficacy of the optimized T-SPOT.TB indicators was evaluated.Results A total of 132 patients were included in this study,out of whom 78 patients(59.09%)were diagnosed with STB,and 54(40.91%)were diagnosed with non-tuberculosis(non-TB)spinal infection.The sensitivity and specificity of T-SPOT.TB in differential diagnosis of STB were 67.68%and 66.67%,respectively.Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that compared with non-TB spinal infection,the OR va-lue of T-SPOT.TB test in diagnosing STB was 4.188(95%CI:1.847-9.974,P<0.001).The optimized T-SPOT.TB evaluation index through ROC curve to determine the optimal cut-off values of ESAT-6,CFP-10,and CFP-10+ESAT-6 for differential diagnosis of STB and non-TB spinal infection were 12.5,19.5,and 36,respectively,and area under curve(AUC)values were 0.7656,0.7415,and 0.7786,respectively,all with good diagnostic efficacy.CFP-10+ESAT-6 had the highest AUC.CFP-10+ESAT-6 specific spot count had higher efficacy in the diagnosis of STB,with a diagnostic accuracy of 75.56%,higher than 67.42%of pre-optimized T-SPOT.TB.Conclusion T-SPOT.TB test has high diagnostic efficacy in differentiating STB from non-TB spinal infection.Positivity in T-SPOT.TB test,especially with spot count of CFP-10+ESAT-6 over 36,indicates a higher likelihood of STB.