摘要
为了解我国高中数学教科书插图的设置,基于《普通高中数学课程标准(2017年版2020年修订)》的内容要求,对2019年出版的人教A版与北师大版高中数学教科书的插图数量、插图位置、插图类型及插图功能进行比较研究.研究表明:在插图数量上,北师大版插图密度高于人教A版;在插图位置上,2版教科书文中图所占比例较大,与正文篇幅呈现较强相关性;在插图类型上,2版教科书数学图所占比例最高;在插图功能上,2版教科书都重视表征型插图的使用.针对研究结论提出适当调整插图数量、注重插图位置编排、合理设计插图类型、有效发挥插图功能的建议.
In order to understand the setting of illustrations in high school mathematics textbooks in China,based on the content requirements of the General High School Mathematics Curriculum Standards(2017 Edition,2020 Revision),a comparative study was conducted on the number,position,type,and function of illustrations in high school mathematics textbooks published in 2019 between the People′s Education A Edition and the Beijing Normal University Edition.The results showed that in terms of illustration number,the density of illustrations in the Beijing Normal University Edition was higher than that in the People′s Education A Edition;in terms of illustration placement,the proportion of images in the text of the two editions of textbooks was relatively large,showing a strong correlation with the length of the main text;in terms of illustration types,the proportion of mathematical diagrams in the two editions of textbooks was the highest;in terms of illustration function,both versions of textbooks attached the importance to the use of representational illustrations.Based on the research results,some suggestions are proposed to adjust the number of illustrations appropriately,pay attention to the arrangement of illustration positions,design the illustration types reasonably,and utilize the illustration functions effectively.
作者
李锐
张玉杰
王思亮
LI Rui;ZHANG Yujie;WANG Siliang(School of Mathematical Sciences,Guizhou Normal University,Gui'an New District Guizhou 550025)
出处
《辽宁师专学报(自然科学版)》
2023年第4期11-16,51,共7页
Journal of Liaoning Normal College(Natural Science Edition)
关键词
高中数学
教科书插图
人教A版
北师大版
课程标准
high school mathematics
textbook ilustrations
People's Education A Edition
Beijing Normal University Edition
criterion for curriculum