期刊文献+

腹腔镜袖状胃切除术后患者生活质量评估工具的研究进展 被引量:1

Research progress on quality of life assessment tools for patients with laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy
原文传递
导出
摘要 腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(LSG)作为目前公认效果较好的减重术式,在国内外被广泛应用,同时术后患者生活质量也得到广泛关注。目前,国内研究者常采用普适性量表对术后患者生活质量评价,但此类量表不能真实反映术后患者生活质量。本文对LSG术后患者生活质量普适性和特异性评估工具进行综述,阐述各评估工具的优缺点,并对特异性评估工具进行比较分析,提出特异性评估工具不足之处以及未来的研究方向,旨在为选择和开发更适合中国LSG术后患者生活质量的评估工具提供参考。 Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy,as the significantly effective weight loss surgery currently recognized,is widely used at home and abroad,and the quality of life of postoperative patients also receives widespread attention.At present,domestic researchers often use universal scales to evaluate the quality of life of postoperative patients,but such scales cannot truly reflect the quality of life of postoperative patients.This paper reviews the universal and specific assessment tools for quality of life in patients after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy,elaborates on the advantages and disadvantages of each tool,compares and analyzes the specific assessment tools,and proposes the shortcomings of the specific assessment tools and future research directions.The aim is to provide a reference for selecting and developing suitable assessment tools for the quality of life of patients after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in China.
作者 杨言 谢铭 郑喜兰 詹晓庆 Yang Yan;Xie Ming;Zheng Xilan;Zhan Xiaoqing(Department of General Surgery,Digestive Disease Hospital,Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University,Zunyi 563000,China;School of Nursing,Zunyi Medical University,Zunyi 563000,China)
出处 《中华现代护理杂志》 2024年第1期111-117,共7页 Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
基金 2023年贵州省卫生健康委科学技术基金(gzwkj2023-154)。
关键词 综述 减重手术 腹腔镜袖状胃切除 生活质量 量表 Review Bariatric surgery Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy Quality of life Scale
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献124

  • 1欧阳昉,杜元灏.针灸治疗肥胖症的研究进展[J].世界最新医学信息文摘,2019,0(93):110-111. 被引量:6
  • 2李灿,辛玲.调查问卷的信度与效度的评价方法研究[J].中国卫生统计,2008,25(5):541-544. 被引量:455
  • 3曾五一,黄炳艺.调查问卷的可信度和有效度分析[J].统计与信息论坛,2005,20(6):11-15. 被引量:355
  • 4Liu CL,Lai ECS,Lo CM,et al. Combined laparoscopic and endoscopic approach in patients with cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis[J]. Surgery, 1996,119 : 534-537.
  • 5de Haes JCJM,Knippenberg FCE. The quality of life of cancer patients: a review of the literature[J]. Soc Sci Med 1985.20:809-817.
  • 6Moinpour CM,Feigl P, Meteh B, et al. Quality of life endpoints in cancer clinical trials review and reeommendations[J].J Natl Cancer Inst 1989,81: 485-495.
  • 7Wood-Dauphinee S.Troidl H. Assessing quality of life in surgical studies[J]. Theor Surg 1989,4 : 35-44.
  • 8Eypasch E, Williams JI, Wood-Dauphinee S, et al. Gastrointestinal quality of life index:development, validation and application of a new instrument[J]. Br J Surg.1995,82:216-271.
  • 9Troidl H, Wechsler AS,Mckneally MF. How to choose a relevant endpoints. In: Troidl H, ed. Surgical research. 3rd ed.New York : Springer, 1997 : 303-320.
  • 10Phillip EH. New techniques for the treatment of common bile duct calcuol encountered during laparoscopic cholecystectomy[J]. Probl Gen Surg,1991,8:837.

共引文献2640

同被引文献11

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部